Understanding and improving discretionary judgment and decision-making in child protection practice: Towards a whole-of-system policy evaluation

Published on Apr 6, 2019in Social Work & Social Sciences Review
· DOI :10.1921/swssr.v20i1.1136
David Hodgson4
Estimated H-index: 4
(ECU: Edith Cowan University),
Lynelle Watts4
Estimated H-index: 4
(ECU: Edith Cowan University),
Donna Chung7
Estimated H-index: 7
(Curtin University)
Discretionary judgment is a necessary and desirable attribute of child protection practice and decision-making. Increasingly, approaches towards accountability in child protection services act to constrain the use of practitioner discretionary judgement through ever increasing layers of standardisation and technical-rational approaches to practice. This situation is at odds with the need for professionals to adaptively respond to practice environments that are characterised by uncertainty and complexity. At the same time, there are known weakness and problems that are reported in the decision-making literature, begging questions about how to best support and evaluate for effective and accountable discretion and decision-making across a whole system. In this paper discretion is conceptualised as a structural and epistemic phenomena that is constrained and restricted under the weight of standardisation. A five-part conceptual framework for a systems approach to policy evaluation is presented, and it is argued that this framework would support the capacity for effective discretionary judgement and decision-making to emerge as a property of the system overall. This paper is a theoretical and conceptual argument for a systemic policy evaluation framework that is supportive of discretionary judgment and decision-making in child protection systems shifting the emphasis away from technical-rational compliance.
  • References (0)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
11 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
Cited By0