Match!

The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy is independent of the pancreatic stump closure technique – A retrospective analysis of 284 cases

Published on Apr 1, 2019in Asian Journal of Surgery1.56
· DOI :10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.03.009
S Chikhladze4
Estimated H-index: 4
(University of Freiburg),
Frank Makowiec27
Estimated H-index: 27
(University of Freiburg)
+ 5 AuthorsUwe A. Wittel19
Estimated H-index: 19
(University of Freiburg)
Abstract
Summary Background Many techniques have been developed to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy, but POPF rates remain high. The aim of our study was to analyze POPF occurrence after closure of the pancreatic remnant by different operative techniques. Methods Between 2006 and 2017, 284 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy in our institution. For subgroup analysis the patients were divided into hand-sewn (n = 201) and stapler closure (n = 52) groups. The hand-sewn closure was performed in three different ways (fishmouth-technique, n = 27; interrupted transpancreatic U-suture technique, n = 77; common interrupted suture, n = 97). All other techniques were summarized in a separate group (n = 31). Results were gained by analysis of our prospective pancreatic database. Results The median age was 63 (range 23–88) years. 74 of 284 patients (26%) were operated with spleen preservation (similar rates in subgroups). ASA-classes, median BMI as well as frequencies of malignant diseases, chronic pancreatitis, alcohol and nicotine abuse were also comparable in the subgroups. Neither the rates of overall POPF (fishmouth-technique 30%, common interrupted suture 40%, stapler closure 33% and interrupted U-suture 38%) nor the rates of POPF grades B and C showed significant differences in the subgroups. However is shown to be associated with pancreatic function and parenchymal texture. Conclusion In our experience the technique of pancreatic stump closure after distal resection did not influence postoperative pancreatic fistula rate. As a consequence patient specific reasons rather than surgical techniques may be responsible for POPF formation after distal pancreatectomy.
  • References (40)
  • Citations (1)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
20123.05Hpb
6 Authors (Fritz Klein, ..., MarcusBahra)
17 Citations
8 Authors (Orlin Belyaev, ..., Waldemar Uhl)
30 Citations
5 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References40
Newest
#1M Del ChiaroH-Index: 23
#2Marc G. BesselinkH-Index: 50
Last. L. WustenH-Index: 1
view all 89 authors...
Evidence-based guidelines on the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are lacking. This guideline is a joint initiative of the European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas, United European Gastroenterology, European Pancreatic Club, European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, European Digestive Surgery, and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. It replaces the 2013 European consensus statement guidelines on PCN. European and non-European experts perf...
96 CitationsSource
#1Giovanni Marchegiani (University of Verona)H-Index: 19
#2Roberto BallarinH-Index: 15
Last. Roberto Salvia (University of Verona)H-Index: 37
view all 12 authors...
Background Pancreatic texture is one of the key predictors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Currently, the “gold standard” for assessment of pancreatic texture is surgeon’s subjective evaluation through manual palpation.
4 CitationsSource
#1MasaoTanakaH-Index: 76
#2Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo (Harvard University)H-Index: 82
Last. Christopher L. Wolfgang (Johns Hopkins University)H-Index: 74
view all 10 authors...
Abstract The management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) continues to evolve. In particular, the indications for resection of branch duct IPMN have changed from early resection to more deliberate observation as proposed by the international consensus guidelines of 2006 and 2012. Another guideline proposed by the American Gastroenterological Association in 2015 restricted indications for surgery more stringently and recommended physicians to stop surveillance if no significant ch...
178 CitationsSource
#1Ilhan Karabicak (Kansai Medical University)H-Index: 3
#2Sohei Satoi (Kansai Medical University)H-Index: 24
Last. Masanori Kon (Kansai Medical University)H-Index: 9
view all 12 authors...
Abstract Background To find the appropriate method of pancreatic transection during distal pancreatectomy (DP), we retrospectively compared post-operative complications including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) according to the different types of pancreatic transection. Methods This study included 169 patients who underwent pancreatic transection using an ultrasonic activated device (USAD) with transfixion of the pancreatic duct (DP-TF group, n = 89), USAD followed by pancreaticogastrost...
5 CitationsSource
#1Claudio BassiH-Index: 80
Last. Markus W. Büchler (Heidelberg University)H-Index: 127
view all 33 authors...
Background In 2005, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula developed a definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula that has been accepted universally. Eleven years later, because postoperative pancreatic fistula remains one of the most relevant and harmful complications of pancreatic operation, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula classification has become the gold standard in defining postoperative pancreatic fistula in clinical practice. The aim of th...
421 CitationsSource
#1Maximilian Weniger (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 6
#2Jan G. D’Haese (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 7
Last. Werner Hartwig (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 36
view all 6 authors...
Background Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) causes significant morbidity and mortality after distal pancreatectomy. Patch coverage of the pancreatic stump is often used with the intention to prevent POPF. Despite numerous investigations, the effects of patch coverage remain unclear. The present meta-analysis aims to clarify the effects of patch coverage in distal pancreatectomy on the incidence of POPF.
7 CitationsSource
#1Andreas Minh LuuH-Index: 3
#2Chris BraumannH-Index: 18
Last. Torsten HerzogH-Index: 13
view all 6 authors...
Hintergrund: Die postoperative Pankreasfistel nach Pankreaslinksresektion ist bis heute ein ungelostes Problem, denn unabhangig von der Verschlusstechnik entwickeln etwa 30 % der Patienten nach einer Pankreaslinksresektion eine Pankreasfistel. Erstmals wurde bei Pankreaslinksresektionen autologes Fibrin (Vivostat®) zum additiven Abdichten des Pankreasabsetzungsrands verwendet. Ziel war es, zu untersuchen, ob ein verandertes postoperatives Ergebnis vorliegt. Patienten/Material und Methoden: Im Ja...
3 CitationsSource
#1Felix J. Hüttner (Heidelberg University)H-Index: 11
#2André L. Mihaljevic (Heidelberg University)H-Index: 14
Last. Markus K. Diener (Heidelberg University)H-Index: 32
view all 6 authors...
Purpose Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a frequent and clinically relevant problem after distal pancreatectomy. A variety of methods have been tested in the attempt to prevent POPF, most of them without convincing results.
14 CitationsSource
#1Eugene P. Ceppa (IU: Indiana University)H-Index: 18
#2Robert M. McCurdy (IU: Indiana University)H-Index: 1
Last. Michael G. House (IU: Indiana University)H-Index: 20
view all 10 authors...
Background Pancreatic fistula remains the primary source of morbidity following distal pancreatectomy. Previous studies have reported specific methods of parenchymal transection/stump sealing in an effort to decrease the pancreatic fistula rate with highly variable results. The aim of this study was to determine postoperative outcomes following various pancreatic stump-sealing methods.
18 CitationsSource
#1Yasuhiro FujinoH-Index: 24
#2Hiroyoshi SendoH-Index: 5
Last. Masahiro TominagaH-Index: 17
view all 5 authors...
Purpose Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a serious complication of pancreatectomy and many techniques and devices have been designed to prevent PF and abdominal bleeding after pancreatectomy. We report a modified technique using a patch of the falciform ligament to prevent PF formation after distal pancreatectomy (DP).
4 CitationsSource
Cited By1
Newest
#1Amyna Jiwani (RPH: Royal Perth Hospital)
#2Tabish Chawla (Aga Khan University Hospital)H-Index: 5
Introduction. Benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas located at the body and tail of the pancreas are managed by the standard procedure of distal pancreatectomy (DP). The mortality associated with this procedure is reported as less than 5% in high-volume centers. The major proportion of morbidity is comprised of pancreatic fistula with a reported incidence of 5% to 60%. The most considered risk factors associated with pancreatic fistula formation are soft pancreatic texture, diameter of th...
Source