Match!

A polygenic risk score for breast cancer in U.S. Latinas and Latin-American women

Published on Apr 12, 2019in bioRxiv
· DOI :10.1101/598730
Yiwey Shieh8
Estimated H-index: 8
(University of California, Berkeley),
Laura Fejerman17
Estimated H-index: 17
(University of California, Berkeley)
+ 20 AuthorsSusan L. Neuhausen66
Estimated H-index: 66
(Beckman Research Institute)
Abstract
Background: Over 180 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with breast cancer susceptibility have been identified; these SNPs can be combined into polygenic risk scores (PRS) to predict breast cancer risk. Since most SNPs were identified in predominantly European populations, little is known about the performance of PRS in non-Europeans. We tested the performance of a 180-SNP PRS in Latinas, a large ethnic group with variable levels of Indigenous American, European, and African ancestry. Methods: We conducted a pooled case-control analysis of U.S. Latinas and Latin-American women (4,658 cases, 7,629 controls). We constructed a 180-SNP PRS consisting of SNPs associated with breast cancer risk (p < 5 x 10-8). We evaluated the association between the PRS and breast cancer risk using multivariable logistic regression and assessed discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). We also assessed PRS performance across quartiles of Indigenous American genetic ancestry. Results: Of 180 SNPs tested, 140 showed directionally consistent associations compared with European populations, and 43 were nominally significant (p < 0.05). The PRS was associated with breast cancer risk, with an odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation increment of 1.58 (95% CI 1.52-1.64) and AUCROC of 0.63 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.64). The discrimination of the PRS was similar between the top and bottom quartiles of Indigenous American ancestry. Conclusions: The 180-SNP PRS predicts breast cancer risk in Latinas, with similar performance as reported for Europeans. The performance of the PRS did not vary substantially according to Indigenous American ancestry.
  • References (44)
  • Citations (2)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
5 Citations
1 Citations
13 Authors (Shengfeng Wang, ..., Dezheng Huo)
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References44
Newest
#1Alicia R. Martin (Harvard University)H-Index: 22
#2Masahiro KanaiH-Index: 14
Last. M. J. DalyH-Index: 15
view all 6 authors...
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are poised to improve biomedical outcomes via precision medicine. However, the major ethical and scientific challenge surrounding clinical implementation of PRS is that those available today are several times more accurate in individuals of European ancestry than other ancestries. This disparity is an inescapable consequence of Eurocentric biases in genome-wide association studies, thus highlighting that—unlike clinical biomarkers and prescription drugs, which may ind...
206 CitationsSource
#1Giorgio Sirugo (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 37
#1Giorgio Sirugo (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 1
Last. Sarah A. Tishkoff (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 56
view all 3 authors...
The majority of studies of genetic association with disease have been performed in Europeans. This European bias has important implications for risk prediction of diseases across global populations. In this commentary, we justify the need to study more diverse populations using both empirical examples and theoretical reasoning.
92 CitationsSource
#1Joshua D. Hoffman (UCSF: University of California, San Francisco)H-Index: 11
#2Laura Fejerman (UCSF: University of California, San Francisco)H-Index: 17
Last. Elad Ziv (UCSF: University of California, San Francisco)H-Index: 54
view all 22 authors...
Breast cancer is a partially heritable trait and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified over 180 common genetic variants associated with breast cancer. We have previously performed breast cancer GWAS in Latinas and identified a strongly protective single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at 6q25, with the protective minor allele originating from indigenous American ancestry. Here we report on fine mapping of the 6q25 locus in an expanded sample of Latinas. We performed GWAS in 2385 c...
7 CitationsSource
#1Nasim Mavaddat (University of Cambridge)H-Index: 14
#2Kyriaki Michailidou (University of Cambridge)H-Index: 38
Last. Doug Easton (University of Cambridge)H-Index: 55
view all 269 authors...
Stratification of women according to their risk of breast cancer based on polygenic risk scores (PRSs) could improve screening and prevention strategies. Our aim was to develop PRSs, optimized for prediction of estrogen receptor (ER)-specific disease, from the largest available genome-wide association dataset and to empirically validate the PRSs in prospective studies. The development dataset comprised 94,075 case subjects and 75,017 control subjects of European ancestry from 69 studies, divided...
129 CitationsSource
#1Alicia R. Martin (Broad Institute)H-Index: 22
#2Masahiro Kanai (Harvard University)H-Index: 14
Last. M. J. Daly (Broad Institute)H-Index: 15
view all 6 authors...
Polygenic risk scores have the potential to improve health outcomes for a variety of complex diseases and are poised for clinical translation, driven by the low cost of genotyping (
28 CitationsSource
#1Mary Helen BlackH-Index: 29
#2Shuwei LiH-Index: 6
Last. Brigette Tippin DavisH-Index: 9
view all 12 authors...
1508Background: While assessment of genetic contribution to breast cancer (BC) risk was once limited to high-penetrance genes such as BRCA1/2, additional genes conferring two- to five-fold increased risks of BC, as well common SNPs with relative risks ranging 1.03-1.57, have recently been identified. Although several reports suggest that a score based on combined genotypes across a large number of SNPs may have substantial predictive value for risk stratification in the general population, few s...
6 CitationsSource
#1Jenna Lilyquist (Mayo Clinic)H-Index: 11
#2Kathryn J. Ruddy (Mayo Clinic)H-Index: 31
Last. Fergus J. Couch (Mayo Clinic)H-Index: 89
view all 4 authors...
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the United States with up to 30% of those diagnosed displaying a family history of breast cancer. To date, 18% of the familial risk of breast cancer can be explained by common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This review summarizes the discovery of risk-associated SNPs using candidate gene and genome-wide association studies (GWAS), including discovery and replication in large collaborative efforts such as COGS and OncoArray. We discu...
34 CitationsSource
#1Shengfeng Wang (PKU: Peking University)H-Index: 4
#2Frank Qian (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 10
Last. Dezheng Huo (U of C: University of Chicago)H-Index: 54
view all 13 authors...
Background Few studies have evaluated the performance of existing breast cancer risk prediction models among women of African ancestry. In replication studies of genetic variants, a change in direction of the risk association is a common phenomenon. Termed flip-flop, it means that a variant is risk factor in one population but protective in another, affecting the performance of risk prediction models.
12 CitationsSource
#1Kyriaki Michailidou (University of Cambridge)H-Index: 38
#2Sara Lindström (Harvard University)H-Index: 47
Last. Asha Rostamianfar (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 3
view all 359 authors...
Breast cancer risk is influenced by rare coding variants in susceptibility genes, such as BRCA1, and many common, mostly non-coding variants. However, much of the genetic contribution to breast cancer risk remains unknown. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study of breast cancer in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry and 14,068 cases and 13,104 controls of East Asian ancestry1. We identified 65 new loci that are associated with overall breast cancer risk...
363 CitationsSource
#1Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker (University of Cambridge)H-Index: 22
#2Lesley McGuffog (University of Cambridge)H-Index: 39
Last. Antonis C. Antoniou (University of Cambridge)H-Index: 64
view all 21 authors...
Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 94 common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with breast cancer (BC) risk and 18 associated with ovarian cancer (OC) risk. Several of these are also associated with risk of BC or OC for women who carry a pathogenic mutation in the high-risk BC and OC genes BRCA1 or BRCA2. The combined effects of these variants on BC or OC risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have not yet been assessed while their clinical man...
69 CitationsSource
Cited By2
Newest
#1Katie Marker (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 2
#2Valentina A. Zavala (UCSF: University of California, San Francisco)H-Index: 2
Last. H FuentesH-Index: 3
view all 38 authors...
Women of Latin American origin in the United States are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced breast cancer and have a higher risk of mortality than non-Hispanic White women. Studies in U.S. Latinas and Latin American women have reported a high incidence of HER2 positive (+) tumors; however, the factors contributing to this observation are unknown. Genome-wide genotype data for 1,312 patients from the Peruvian Genetics and Genomics of Breast Cancer Study (PEGEN-BC) were used to estimate gene...
2 CitationsSource
#1Samuel A. LambertH-Index: 8
#1S. A. LambertH-Index: 1
Last. Michael InouyeH-Index: 47
view all 3 authors...
Prediction of disease risk is an essential part of preventative medicine, often guiding clinical management. Risk prediction typically includes risk factors such as age, sex, family history of disease and lifestyle (e.g. smoking status); however, in recent years, there has been increasing interest to include genomic information into risk models. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) aggregate the effects of many genetic variants across the human genome into a single score and have recently been shown to h...
25 CitationsSource