Quality Control for Scientific Research: Addressing Reproducibility, Responsiveness, and Relevance
Abstract
Efforts to address a reproducibility crisis have generated several valid proposals for improving the quality of scientific research. We argue there is also need to address the separate but related issues of relevance and responsiveness. To address relevance, researchers must produce what decision makers actually need to inform investments and public policy—that is, the probability that a claim is true or the probability distribution of an effect...
Paper Details
Title
Quality Control for Scientific Research: Addressing Reproducibility, Responsiveness, and Relevance
Published Date
Mar 20, 2019
Journal
Volume
73
Issue
sup1
Pages
46 - 55
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History