Can We Change the Topic, Please? Assessing the Theoretical Construction of International Relations Scholarship

Volume: 63, Issue: 2, Pages: 432 - 447
Published: Mar 16, 2019
Abstract
A number of international relations scholars charge that the field suffers from academic religiosity: factional divisions along theoretical lines that limit research potential and create unnecessary bias against certain approaches. I explore this view of the field by applying a topic-modeling algorithm to a corpus of article abstracts from prominent journals in international relations. I generate a new dataset of information on international...
Paper Details
Title
Can We Change the Topic, Please? Assessing the Theoretical Construction of International Relations Scholarship
Published Date
Mar 16, 2019
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
432 - 447
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.