Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
Volume: 117, Issue: 3, Pages: 560 - 578
Published: Sep 1, 2019
Abstract
Humans consistently face the challenge of discerning liars from truth-tellers. Hundreds of studies in which observers judge the veracity of laboratory-created lies and truths suggest that this is a difficult task; in this context, lie-detection accuracy is notoriously poor. Challenging these findings and traditional methodologies in lie-detection research, we draw upon the somatic marker hypothesis and research on interoception to find that: (a)...
Paper Details
Title
Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
Published Date
Sep 1, 2019
Volume
117
Issue
3
Pages
560 - 578
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History