In quest of new document relations: evaluating co-opinion relations between co-citations and its impact on Information retrieval effectiveness
Abstract
Document relational network has been effective in retrieving and evaluating papers. Despite their effectiveness, relational measures, including co-citation, are far from ideal and need improvements. The assumption underlying the co-citation relation is the content relevance and opinion relatedness of cited and citing papers. This may imply existence of some kind of co-opinionatedness between co-cited papers which may be effective in improving...
Paper Details
Title
In quest of new document relations: evaluating co-opinion relations between co-citations and its impact on Information retrieval effectiveness
Published Date
Mar 2, 2019
Journal
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
987 - 1008
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History