Match!

Editorial: Enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research

Published on Sep 1, 2019in Journal of Business Venturing6.33
· DOI :10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.02.001
Brian S. Anderson5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UGent: Ghent University),
Karl Wennberg22
Estimated H-index: 22
(Linköping University),
Jeffery S. McMullen24
Estimated H-index: 24
(IU: Indiana University Bloomington)
View in Source
Abstract
The purpose of this editorial is to discuss methodological advancements to enhance quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research. As the impact of entrepreneurship scholarship accelerates and deepens, our methods must keep pace to continue shaping theory, policy, and practice. Like our sister fields in business, entrepreneurship is coming to terms with the replication and credibility crisis in the social sciences, forcing the field to revisit commonly-held assumptions that limit the promise and prospect of our scholarship. Thus, we provide suggestions for reviewers and editors to identify concerns in empirical work, and to guide authors in improving their analyses and research designs. We hope that our editorial provides useful and actionable guidance for entrepreneurship researchers submitting theory-testing papers to Journal of Business Venturing.
Figures & Tables
  • References (82)
  • Citations (4)
References82
Newest
#1Raj K. Shankar (Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India)H-Index: 2
#2Dean A. Shepherd (ND: University of Notre Dame)H-Index: 72
3 CitationsSource
#1Matthew J. SalganikH-Index: 17
47 Citations
#1David W. WilliamsH-Index: 10
#2Matthew S. WoodH-Index: 16
Last.Diemo UrbigH-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Michael Addison Johnson (LSU: Louisiana State University)H-Index: 2
#2Regan M. Stevenson (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 5
Last.Chaim Rossm Letwin (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
13 CitationsSource
#1Henrik Berglund (Chalmers University of Technology)H-Index: 13
#2Dimo DimovH-Index: 23
Last.Karl Wennberg (Linköping University)H-Index: 22
view all 3 authors...
10 CitationsSource
#1John K. Kruschke (IU: Indiana University)H-Index: 34
#2Torrin M. Liddell (IU: Indiana University)H-Index: 5
40 CitationsSource
#1Zoltan Dienes (University of Sussex)H-Index: 45
#2Neil Marvin McLatchie (Lancaster University)H-Index: 7
64 CitationsSource
#1Dina V. KrasikovaH-Index: 8
#2Huy LeH-Index: 23
Last.Eric BachuraH-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
3 CitationsSource
4 CitationsSource
#1Kevin R. Murphy (CSU: Colorado State University)H-Index: 57
#2Craig J. Russell (OU: University of Oklahoma)H-Index: 22
15 CitationsSource
Cited By4
Newest
#1Younggeun Lee (Iowa State University)H-Index: 1
#2Yiming Zhuang (Iowa State University)H-Index: 1
Last.Tae Jun Bae (Hanyang University)
view all 4 authors...
Source
#1Jeni L. Burnette (NCSU: North Carolina State University)H-Index: 17
#2Jeffrey M. Pollack (NCSU: North Carolina State University)H-Index: 16
Last.Anthony E. Coy (University of South Florida Sarasota–Manatee)H-Index: 7
view all 7 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Eva de Mol (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 2
#2Melissa S. Cardon (UT: University of Tennessee)H-Index: 1
Last.Tom Elfring (University of Liverpool)H-Index: 23
view all 5 authors...
Source
#1Karl Wennberg (Linköping University)H-Index: 22
#2Brian S. Anderson (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 5
Source