Scientific novelty and technological impact

Published on Jul 1, 2019in Research Policy
· DOI :10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.019
Reinhilde Veugelers5
Estimated H-index: 5
Jian Wang13
Estimated H-index: 13
(Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)
Abstract This paper explores the complex relationship between scientific novelty and technological impact. We measure novel science as publications which make new combinations of prior knowledge, as reflected in new combinations of journals in their references, and trace links between science and technology by scientific references in patent applications. We draw on all the Web of Science SCIE journal articles published in 2001 and all the patents in PATSTAT (October 2013 edition). We find that the small proportion of scientific publications which score on novelty, particularly the 1% highly novel scientific publications in their field, are significantly and sizably more likely to have direct technological impact than comparable non-novel publications. In addition to this superior likelihood of direct impact, novel science also has a higher probability for indirect technological impact, being more likely to be cited by other scientific publications which have technological impact. Among the set of scientific publications cited at least once by patents, there are no additional significant differences in the speed or the intensity of the technological impact between novel and non-novel scientific prior art, but the technological impact from novel science is significantly broader and reaching new technology fields previously not impacted by its scientific discipline. Novel science is also more likely to lead to patents which are themselves novel.
  • References (54)
  • Citations (1)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
3 Citations
1 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Jian Wang (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 13
#2You-Na Lee (NUS: National University of Singapore)H-Index: 6
Last. John Walsii (Georgia Institute of Technology)H-Index: 30
view all 3 authors...
In many countries the scientific funding system is shifting from an internal block funding model toward a competitive project funding model. However, there is growing concern that the competitive project funding system favors relatively safe, conventional projects at the expense of risky, novel research. It is important to assess different funding models in order to design better funding systems for science. This paper empirically tests for differences in the novelty of funded outputs between in...
6 CitationsSource
#1Anthony F. J. van Raan (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 32
#2Jos J. Winnink (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 5
In this paper we investigate recent Sleeping Beauties cited in patents (SB-SNPRs). We find that the increasing trend of the relative number of SBs stopped around 1998. Moreover, we find that the time lag between the publication year of the SB-SNPRs and their first citation in a patent is becoming shorter in recent years. Our observations also suggest that, on average, in the more recent years SBs are awakened increasingly earlier by a ‘technological prince’ rather than by a ‘scientific prince’. ...
4 CitationsSource
#1David Popp (SU: Syracuse University)H-Index: 31
Expansion of public energy R&D budgets continues to be a key component of climate policy. Using an original data set of both scientific articles and patents pertaining to three alternative energy technologies (biofuels, solar and wind energy), this paper provides new evidence on the flows of knowledge between university, private sector, and government research. Better understanding of the value of knowledge from these institutions can help decision makers target R&D funds where they are most lik...
10 CitationsSource
#1Jian Wang (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 13
#2Reinhilde Veugelers (Bruegel)H-Index: 36
Last. Paula E. Stephan (GSU: Georgia State University)H-Index: 36
view all 3 authors...
Research which explores unchartered waters has a high potential for major impact but also carries a high uncertainty of having minimal impact. Such explorative research is often described as taking a novel approach. This study examines the complex relationship between pursuing a novel approach and impact. We measure novelty by examining the extent to which a published paper makes first time ever combinations of referenced journals, taking into account the difficulty of making such combinations. ...
54 CitationsSource
#1Mohammad Ahmadpoor (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 2
#2Benjamin F. Jones (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 21
The extent to which scientific advances support marketplace inventions is largely unknown. We study 4.8 million U.S. patents and 32 million research articles to determine the minimum citation distance between patented inventions and prior scientific advances. We find that most cited research articles (80%) link forward to a future patent. Similarly, most patents (61%) link backward to a prior research article. Linked papers and patents typically stand 2 to 4 degrees distant from the other domain...
25 CitationsSource
#1Paula E. Stephan (GSU: Georgia State University)H-Index: 36
#2Reinhilde Veugelers (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 36
Last. Jian Wang (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 13
view all 3 authors...
Science panels still rely on poor proxies to judge quality and impact. That results in risk-averse research, say Paula Stephan, Reinhilde Veugelers and Jian Wang.
33 CitationsSource
#1Danielle Li (Harvard University)H-Index: 7
#2Pierre Azoulay (MIT: Massachusetts Institute of Technology)H-Index: 18
Last. Bhaven N. Sampat (Columbia University)H-Index: 29
view all 3 authors...
Public funding for research depends on the idea that the resulting knowledge translates into socially valuable outcomes, such as medicines. Such linkages are easier to assert than to prove. Li et al. studied 27 years of grant-level funding by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. About 10% of grants are directly cited by patents, suggesting some technological application, and 30% of grants are cited in research articles that are then cited in patents. Five percent of grants result in papers ci...
27 CitationsSource
#1Anthony F. J. van Raan (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 32
A ‘Sleeping Beauty in Science’ is a publication that goes unnoticed (‘sleeps’) for a long time and then, almost suddenly, attracts a lot of attention (‘is awakened by a prince’). In our foregoing study we found that roughly half of the Sleeping Beauties are application-oriented and thus are potential Sleeping Innovations. In this paper we investigate a new topic: Sleeping Beauties that are cited in patents. In this way we explore the existence of a dormitory of inventions. To our knowledge this ...
18 CitationsSource
#1Kevin J. Boudreau (Harvard University)H-Index: 15
#2Eva C. Guinan (Harvard University)H-Index: 43
Last. Christoph Riedl (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 16
view all 4 authors...
Selecting among alternative projects is a core management task in all innovating organizations. In this paper, we focus on the evaluation of frontier scientific research projects. We argue that the "intellectual distance" between the knowledge embodied in research proposals and an evaluator's own expertise systematically relates to the evaluations given. To estimate relationships, we designed and executed a grant proposal process at a leading research university in which we randomized the assign...
61 CitationsSource
#1Dennis Verhoeven (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 2
#2Jurriën Bakker (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 3
Last. Reinhilde VeugelersH-Index: 5
view all 3 authors...
This study provides a new, more comprehensive measurement of technological novelty. Integrating insights from the existing economics and management literature, we characterize inventions ex ante along two dimensions of technological novelty: Novelty in Recombination and Novelty in Knowledge Origins. For the latter dimension we distinguish between Novel Technological and Novel Scientific Origins. For each dimension we propose an operationalization using patent classification and citation informat...
41 CitationsSource
Cited By1
#2Haiyan HouH-Index: 4
Last. Zhigang HuH-Index: 6
view all 4 authors...
#1Caroline BirkleH-Index: 1
Last. Jonathan AdamsH-Index: 5
view all 4 authors...
Web of Science (WoS) is the world’s oldest, most widely used and authoritative database of research publications and citations. Based on the Science Citation Index, founded by Eugene Garfield in 19...
8 CitationsSource
#1Maureen McKelvey (University of Gothenburg)H-Index: 22
#2Bastian Rake (MU: Maynooth University)H-Index: 4
Recent research suggests that firms, particularly in science-based industries, may publish scientific articles in order to achieve strategic goals. This paper explores whether the reputation seen as publications in journals with high impact factors and the impact seen as citations of such scientific publications originating in firms benefit from R&D alliances with different types of partners. Our empirical analysis is based on a unique dataset in pharmaceutical cancer research. We analyze public...
#1Matteo Chinazzi (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 6
#2Bruno GonçalvesH-Index: 2
Last. Alessandro Vespignani (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 88
view all 4 authors...
Scientific discoveries do not occur in vacuum but rather by connecting existing pieces of knowledge in new and creative ways. Mapping the relation and structure of scientific knowledge is therefore central to our understanding of the dynamics of scientific production. Here we introduce a new approach to generate scientific knowledge maps based on a machine learning approach that, starting from the observed publication patterns of authors, generates an N -dimensional space where it is possible to...
2 CitationsSource
#1Felix Poege (MPG: Max Planck Society)
#2Dietmar Harhoff (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 43
Last. Stefano Horst Baruffaldi (University of Bath)H-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
Despite decades of research, the relationship between the quality of science and the value of inventions has remained unclear. We present the result of a large-scale matching exercise between 4.8 million patent families and 43 million publication records. We find a strong positive relationship between quality of scientific contributions referenced in patents and the value of the respective inventions. We rank patents by the quality of the science they are linked to. Strikingly, high-rank patents...
1 CitationsSource