Match!

Defining formality: adapting to the abstract demands of academic discourse

Published on Mar 1, 2019in Journal of English for Academic Purposes1.732
· DOI :10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.007
Cassi L. Liardét4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Macquarie University),
Sharyn Black1
Estimated H-index: 1
(UNSW: University of New South Wales),
Vani Sharren Bardetta (Hodges University)
Sources
Abstract
Abstract Measures of formality have historically been linked to the spoken-written language continuum; however, modern communication increasingly employs the written mode using different degrees of informality (e.g., emails, text messages, etc.). While allowances are made for these varied genres and registers, the use of informal expression in the written mode often impacts the quality of academic discourse. The present study aims to map the linguistic features of formality to describe this elusive, often stylistically mapped objective. A corpus of one hundred forty student essays were analyzed and rated for formality by three English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instructors. Those texts consistently scored across all three raters as “high” or “low” formality were further analyzed for lexico-grammatical features (e.g., pronoun use, conjunctions, lexical density, etc.) to determine what linguistic features distinguish the different levels of formality. The analysis reveals the most significant contributor to the impression of informality in the learner texts is infelicitous clause-level grammar, followed by grammatical intricacy, informal lexis and human interaction. These descriptions expand current understandings of how formality is defined and the paper concludes with pedagogical recommendations for supporting students and professionals in their development of formal, academic discourse.
  • References (28)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
7 Citations
2014
2013
1 Author (Wang Kelu)
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References28
Newest
#1Sheena Gardner (Coventry University)H-Index: 11
#2Hilary Nesi (Coventry University)H-Index: 19
Last. Douglas Biber (NAU: Northern Arizona University)H-Index: 40
view all 3 authors...
While there have been many investigations of academic genres, and of the linguistic features of academic discourse, few studies have explored how these interact across a range of university student writing situations. To counter misconceptions that have arisen regarding student writing, this article aims to provide comprehensive linguistic descriptions of a wide range of university assignment genres in relation to multiple situational variables. Our new multidimensional (MD) analysis of the Brit...
7 CitationsSource
#1Shelley Staples (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 7
#2D. O. U. G. L. A. S. Biber (NAU: Northern Arizona University)H-Index: 1
Last. Randi Reppen (NAU: Northern Arizona University)H-Index: 16
view all 3 authors...
One of the central considerations in the validity argument for the TOEFL iBT is the relationship between the language on the exam and the language required for university courses. Corpus linguistics has recently been shown to be an effective way to explore this relationship, which can also be considered as an aspect of authenticity. Applying Multi‐Dimensional Analysis, our study is the first to directly compare the lexico‐grammatical characteristics of texts produced by second language writers o...
3 CitationsSource
Abstract This article investigates Chinese EFL learners' use of evaluation and stance in academic texts by exploring their deployment of interpersonal grammatical metaphors (IGM), a construct mapped within Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL; Halliday, 1985; e.g., I believe, it is evident , etc.). The data is drawn from the Chinese Longitudinal Learner Corpus (CLLC), a two-year diachronic study into university learners' development of academic literacy (Liardet, 2014a). When examining IGM, it i...
3 CitationsSource
#1Ken Hyland (HKU: University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 59
#2Feng (Kevin) Jiang (HKU: University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 6
Informality has become something of a contemporary mantra as, from the denim-clad offices of internet startups to the pages of business reports, we are encouraged to shed old constraints and relax conventions. This paper explores the perception that since informality has now invaded a large range of written and spoken domains of discourse, academic writing has also followed this trend. It asks the question whether academics are now freer to construct less rigidly objective texts and craft a more...
15 CitationsSource
#1Fatemeh Chahkandi (UI: University of Isfahan)H-Index: 1
#2Abbass Eslami Rasekh (UI: University of Isfahan)H-Index: 3
Last. Mansour Tavakoli (UI: University of Isfahan)H-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
1 CitationsSource
Abstract This paper presents a systematic analysis of ten first-year university learners' texts. The texts are exposition essays written at the conclusion of the students' first semester of university study and collected as part of the Macquarie University Longitudinal Learner Corpus (MQLLC). The MQLLC is a longitudinal corpus that follows learners from their first year Academic Communication (AC) unit throughout their tertiary careers. These units are taught using a scaffolded, genre-based peda...
9 CitationsSource
#1Douglas BiberH-Index: 40
#2Susan Conrad (Iowa State University)H-Index: 13
44 CitationsSource
21 CitationsSource
#1Jean Parkinson (Victoria University of Wellington)H-Index: 9
#2Jill Musgrave (Victoria University of Wellington)H-Index: 2
Abstract Compared to conversation or other written registers, written academic prose favours heavy nominal groups, in which the head noun is typically accompanied by premodifiers such as adjectives or nouns, and/or by postmodifiers such as prepositional phrases. Focussing specifically on the noun phrase, this article uses the hypothesised developmental progression index suggested by Biber, Gray, and Poonpon (2011) to consider academic writing produced by two groups of graduate L2 writers. The fi...
52 CitationsSource
#1Douglas Biber (NAU: Northern Arizona University)H-Index: 40
#2Bethany Gray (NAU: Northern Arizona University)H-Index: 14
Abstract The stereotypical view of professional academic writing is that it is grammatically complex, with elaborated structures, and with meaning relations expressed explicitly. In contrast, spoken registers, especially conversation, are believed to have the opposite characteristics. Our goal in the present paper is to challenge these stereotypes, based on results from large-scale corpus investigations. Our findings strongly support the view that academic writing and conversation have dramatica...
158 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest