Review paper

What are considered ‘good facts’?

Volume: 45, Issue: 7, Pages: 473 - 475
Published: Feb 18, 2019
Abstract
In the January edition of the Journal of Medical Ethics , Fujita and Tabuchi (hereafter, Authors) responded that we misunderstood the ‘facts’ in our previous article. Our article’s method was twofold. First, it appealed to normative analysis and publicly accessible materials, and second, it targeted a policy-making approach to public funding. We specifically did not focus on the Center for iPS Cell Research and Application or induced pluripotent...
Paper Details
Title
What are considered ‘good facts’?
Published Date
Feb 18, 2019
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
473 - 475
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.