Reply to Amirav and Newhouse: PC20 versus PD20: Why Change a Scientifically Well-Established and Clinically Relevant Test?
Abstract
No abstract.
Paper Details
Title
Reply to Amirav and Newhouse: PC20 versus PD20: Why Change a Scientifically Well-Established and Clinically Relevant Test?
Published Date
Apr 15, 2019
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History