Too many cooks in the kitchen: The effects of dominance incompatibility on relationship conflict and subsequent abusive supervision

Published on Jun 1, 2019in Leadership Quarterly
· DOI :10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.12.003
Katrina A. Graham4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Suffolk University),
Mary B. Mawritz11
Estimated H-index: 11
(Drexel University)
+ 2 AuthorsJonathan C. Ziegert14
Estimated H-index: 14
(Drexel University)
Abstract Across two studies, we explore the configurational effects of leader and follower dominance on dyadic relationship conflict and subsequent abusive supervision. Drawing from the central tenets of social dominance and interpersonal interaction theories, we propose that various leader-follower dominance combinations can incite abusive supervision via relationship conflict. We first suggest that when leaders and followers are both high on dominance, relationship conflict is likely to result. Furthermore, we suggest that when leaders and followers have incongruent dominance, relationship conflict is also more likely to occur. Finally, we propose that relationship conflict will mediate the relationship between these congruent and incongruent combinations and abusive supervision. Using polynomial regression and response surface analysis, we found support for our hypotheses, and reveal that both high- and low-dominance leaders are susceptible to conflict and subsequent abuse, depending on their followers' dominance. Our research contributes to the existing literature on antecedents of abusive supervision by integrating the role of dominance using configurational and relational perspectives.
  • References (96)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
115 Citations
322 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Katrina A. Graham (Suffolk University)H-Index: 4
#2Scott B. Dust (Miami University)H-Index: 6
Last. Jonathan C. Ziegert (Drexel University)H-Index: 14
view all 3 authors...
According to interpersonal interaction theory, relational harmony surfaces when two individuals have compatible interaction styles. Building from this theory, we propose that supervisor-employee power distance orientation incompatibility will be related to employees' experience of higher levels of relationship conflict with their supervisors. Additionally, we propose an asymmetrical incongruence effect such that relationship conflict will be highest when supervisors are high in power distance an...
8 CitationsSource
#1Kimberley Breevaart (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 10
#2Reinout E. de Vries (UT: University of Twente)H-Index: 29
Abusive supervision is detrimental to both subordinates and organizations. Knowledge about individual differences in personality related to abusive supervision may improve personnel selection and potentially reduce the harmful effects of this type of leadership. Using the HEXACO personality framework, we hypothesized that subordinates perceive leaders high on Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility as less abusive. In a sample of 107 unique supervisor-subordinate dyads that filled out the online ques...
13 CitationsSource
#1Bernd Marcus (FU Hagen: FernUniversität Hagen)H-Index: 18
#2Oliver Weigelt (FU Hagen: FernUniversität Hagen)H-Index: 5
Last. Petra Gelléri (FU Hagen: FernUniversität Hagen)H-Index: 2
view all 5 authors...
In snowball sampling for multisource studies, researchers ask target participants to recruit informants. Despite its widespread use, especially for recruiting informants for multisource research, virtually no published research has addressed possible biases snowball sampling may cause in findings of this type of research. Such potential biases were tested empirically in a multisource study with a sample of 1,058 employed students asked to collect online ratings from their supervisors and coworke...
11 CitationsSource
#1Mary B. MawritzH-Index: 11
#2Rebecca L. Greenbaum (OSU: Oklahoma State University–Stillwater)H-Index: 15
Last. Katrina A. Graham (Suffolk University)H-Index: 4
view all 4 authors...
Drawing on self-regulation theory, we contribute to the abusive supervision literature by testing supervisors’ self-regulation impairment as a key mediator of the relationship between subordinate d...
34 CitationsSource
#1Jeremy D. Mackey (AU: Auburn University)H-Index: 12
#2Rachel E. Frieder (ODU: Old Dominion University)H-Index: 7
Last. Mark J. Martinko (FAMU: Florida A&M University)H-Index: 4
view all 4 authors...
We conducted a meta-analysis and empirical review of abusive supervision research in order to derive meta-analytic population estimates for the relationships between perceptions of abusive supervision and numerous demographic, justice, individual difference, leadership, and outcome variables. The use of psychometric correction enabled us to provide weighted mean correlations and population correlation estimates that accounted for attenuation due to measurement error and sampling error variance. ...
107 CitationsSource
#1Lingyan Hu (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 1
#2Yan Liu (WHU: Wuhan University)H-Index: 1
Abstract Abusive supervision in the workplace is an important issue because it is detrimental to organizations and their performance. However, little is known about antecedents of supervisors' abusive behavior. To better understand the antecedents of abusive supervision, we develop a model that illustrates why, how and when supervisors display sustained abusive behavior toward their subordinates. Focusing on status, we propose that a motivation for status enhancement mediates the relationship be...
4 CitationsSource
#1Yucheng Zhang (SWUFE: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)H-Index: 3
#2Timothy C. Bednall (Swinburne University of Technology)H-Index: 13
Recent studies of organizational behavior have witnessed a growing interest in unethical leadership, leading to the development of abusive supervision research. Given the increasing interest in the causes of abusive supervision, this study proposes an organizing framework for its antecedents and tests it using meta analysis. Based on an analysis of effect sizes drawn from 74 studies, comprising 30,063 participants, the relationship between abusive supervision and different antecedent categories ...
39 CitationsSource
#1Lindie H. Liang (UW: University of Waterloo)H-Index: 7
#2Huiwen Lian (HKUST: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)H-Index: 12
Last. Lisa M. Keeping (WLU: Wilfrid Laurier University)H-Index: 14
view all 6 authors...
Building on prior work which has shown that abusive supervision is a reaction to subordinates’ poor performance, we develop a self-control framework to outline when and why supervisors abuse poor-performing subordinates. In particular, we argue that poor-performing subordinates instill in supervisors a sense of hostility toward the subordinate, which in turn leads to engaging in abusive supervision. Within this self-control framework, poor performance is more likely to lead to abusive supervisio...
46 CitationsSource
#1Kelly Schwind Wilson (Purdue University)H-Index: 7
#2D. Scott DeRue (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 25
Last. Donald E. Conlon (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 29
view all 5 authors...
We build on the small but growing literature documenting personality influences on negotiation by examining how the joint disposition of both negotiators with respect to the interpersonal traits of agreeableness and extraversion influences important negotiation processes and outcomes. Building on similarity-attraction theory, we articulate and demonstrate how being similarly high or similarly low on agreeableness and extraversion leads dyad members to express more positive emotional displays dur...
10 CitationsSource
#1Murat Tarakci (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 6
#2Lindred L. Greer (Stanford University)H-Index: 22
Last. Patrick J. F. Groenen (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 28
view all 3 authors...
Power differences are ubiquitous in social settings. However, the question of whether groups with higher or lower power disparity achieve better performance has thus far received conflicting answers. To address this issue, we identify 3 underlying assumptions in the literature that may have led to these divergent findings, including a myopic focus on static hierarchies, an assumption that those at the top of hierarchies are competent at group tasks, and an assumption that equality is not possibl...
18 CitationsSource
Cited By0