Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies

Published on Apr 1, 2019in Computers in Education
· DOI :10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005
Carola Strobl3
Estimated H-index: 3
(University of Antwerp),
Emilie Ailhaud1
Estimated H-index: 1
(University of Lyon)
+ 4 AuthorsChristian Rapp4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Winterthur Museum, Garden and Library)
Abstract This paper presents a review of the technologies designed to support writing instruction in secondary and higher education. The review covers tools to support first and second language writers and focuses on instructional affordances based on their technological specifications. Previous studies in this field centred on Automated Writing Evaluation, Automated Essay Scoring and the rarer Intelligent Tutoring Systems, addressing mainly essay writing needs in US secondary school instruction. With technology-enhanced learning becoming more ubiquitous and widespread, new technologies and tools catering to a broader range of genres, pedagogical settings, and approaches are emerging. We present a systematic analysis of 44 tools across 26 quantitative and qualitative features related to writing processes, pedagogical approaches, feedback modalities and technological specifications. The results uncover an imbalance of available tools with regard to supported languages, genres, and pedagogical focus. While a considerable number of tools support argumentative essay writing in English, other academic writing genres (e.g., research articles) and other languages are under-represented. With regard to the pedagogical focus, automated support for revising on the micro-level targeting factual knowledge (e.g., grammar, spelling, word frequencies) is well represented, whereas tools that support the development of writing strategies and encourage self-monitoring to improve macro-level text quality (e.g., argumentative structure, rhetorical moves) are infrequent. By mapping the state of the art and specifying direction for further research and development, this review is of interest to researchers, policymakers, tool developers, and practitioners of writing instruction in higher and secondary education institutions.
  • References (32)
  • Citations (1)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
18 Citations
1 Author (Duygu Bektik)
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
#1Christian Rapp (Zürcher Fachhochschule)H-Index: 4
#2Peter Emau KaufH-Index: 1
No thesis - no graduation. Academic writing poses manifold challenges to students, instructors and institutions alike. High labor costs, increasing student numbers, and the Bologna Process (which has reduced the period after which undergraduates in Europe submit their first thesis and thus the time available to focus on writing skills) all pose a threat to students’ academic writing abilities. This situation gave rise to the practical goal of this study: to determine if, and to what extent, acad...
4 CitationsSource
#1Laura K. AllenH-Index: 10
Last. Danielle S. McNamaraH-Index: 50
view all 3 authors...
15 Citations
#1Elena Cotos (Iowa State University)H-Index: 8
This article aims to engage specialists in writing pedagogy, assessment, genre study, and educational technologies in a constructive dialog and joint exploration of automated writing analysis as a potent instantiation of computer-enhanced assessment for learning. It recounts the values of writing pedagogy and, from this perspective, examines legitimate concerns with automated writing analysis. Emphasis is placed on the need to substantiate the construct-driven debate with systematic empirical ev...
4 CitationsSource
#1Steve GrahamH-Index: 53
#2Michael HebertH-Index: 16
Last. Karen R. Harris (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 59
view all 3 authors...
AbstractTo determine whether formative writing assessments that are directly tied to everyday classroom teaching and learning enhance students’ writing performance, we conducted a meta-analysis of true and quasi-experiments conducted with students in grades 1 to 8. We found that feedback to students about writing from adults, peers, self, and computers statistically enhanced writing quality, yielding average weighted effect sizes of 0.87, 0.58, 0.62, and 0.38, respectively. We did not find, howe...
46 CitationsSource
#1Jinrong Li (GS: Georgia Southern University)H-Index: 4
#2Stephanie Link (Iowa State University)H-Index: 7
Last. Volker Hegelheimer (Iowa State University)H-Index: 15
view all 3 authors...
Abstract The development of language processing technologies and statistical methods has enabled modern automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems to provide feedback on language and content in addition to an automated score. However, concerns have been raised with regard to the instructional and assessment value of AWE in writing classrooms. The findings from a few classroom-based studies concerning the impact of AWE on writing instruction and performance are largely inconclusive. Meanwhile, si...
25 CitationsSource
#1Azim DaneshH-Index: 1
#2April BaileyH-Index: 1
Last. Thomas WhisenandH-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
Many universities and colleges have been expanding distance education offerings. This paper examines the role of technology in interaction and communication as relates to distance education. Interaction models were extended to include the instructor-interface interaction. The impact of each interaction on the success of the educational outcome, as determined by the students completing a questionnaire, was compiled for classes. The results showed that learner-instructor and learner-learner intera...
3 Citations
#1Rod D. Roscoe (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 19
#2Laura K. Allen (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 10
Last. Danielle S. McNamara (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 50
view all 5 authors...
The Writing Pal (W-Pal) is an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) designed to improve students’ writing proficiency via a unique combination of explicit strategy instruction, game-based practice, essay writing practice, and automated formative feedback. To develop and refine the many features of the W-Pal tutoring system, we have employed a multiple-method usability testing approach, which capitalizes on the complementary strengths and weakness of methods such as focus groups, component studies, i...
47 CitationsSource
#1Cerstin MahlowH-Index: 4
#2Robert DaleH-Index: 34
2 Citations
#1Saiying Steenbergen-Hu (Duke University)H-Index: 7
#2Harris Cooper (Duke University)H-Index: 64
This meta-analysis synthesizes research on the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) for college students. Thirty-five reports were found containing 39 studies assessing the effectiveness of 22 types of ITS in higher education settings. Most frequently studied were AutoTutor, Assessment and Learning in Knowledge Spaces, eXtended Tutor-Expert System, and Web Interface for Statistics Education. Major findings include (a) Overall, ITS had a moderate positive effect on college students...
74 CitationsSource
#1Min 楊敏 Yang (EUHK: Hong Kong Institute of Education)H-Index: 1
#2David Carless (HKU: University of Hong Kong)H-Index: 29
This article explores some of the main barriers to the enhancement of feedback processes and proposes a framework for using dialogic feedback to foster productive student learning in the discipline. The framework suggests a feedback triangle focused on the content of feedback (cognitive dimension), the interpersonal negotiation of feedback (social-affective dimension) and the organisation of feedback provision (structural dimension). The interplay between these three elements is central to prosp...
91 CitationsSource
Cited By1
#1Ferit Kili (Mehmet Akif Ersoy University)H-Index: 10
#1Hercy N. H. Cheng (CCNU: Central China Normal University)H-Index: 8
#2Xiaotong Zhang (CCNU: Central China Normal University)
In this chapter, the authors demonstrate two cases of self-regulated learning behavior analysis in academic reading and writing. In the first case, graduate students are participated in a negotiated academic reading assessment, which provided additional opportunities to negotiate with the system for changing their estimated ability of academic reading comprehension after tests. The negotiation actions in the system mainly include checking results, explaining results, taking tests, evaluating abi...
#1Kathryn S. McCarthy (GSU: Georgia State University)H-Index: 3
#2Rod D. Roscoe (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 19
Last. Danielle S. McNamara (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 50
view all 4 authors...
This study investigated the effect of incorporating spelling and grammar checking tools within an automated writing tutoring system, Writing Pal. High school students (n = 119) wrote and revised six persuasive essays. After initial drafts, all students received formative feedback about writing strategies. Half of the participants were also given access to spelling and grammar checking tools during the writing and revision periods. Linear mixed effects models revealed that essay quality for stude...