Match!

Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) by using work stress models

Published on Dec 1, 2019
· DOI :10.1186/s41073-019-0066-6
Tamarinde L. Haven2
Estimated H-index: 2
(VU: VU University Amsterdam),
Marije Esther Evalien de Goede1
Estimated H-index: 1
+ 1 AuthorsFrans J. Oort50
Estimated H-index: 50
(UvA: University of Amsterdam)
View in Source
Abstract
The emphasis on impact factors and the quantity of publications intensifies competition between researchers. This competition was traditionally considered an incentive to produce high-quality work, but there are unwanted side-effects of this competition like publication pressure. To measure the effect of publication pressure on researchers, the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) was developed. Upon using the PPQ, some issues came to light that motivated a revision. We constructed two new subscales based on work stress models using the facet method. We administered the revised PPQ (PPQr) to a convenience sample together with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ). To assess which items best measured publication pressure, we carried out a principal component analysis (PCA). Reliability was sufficient when Cronbach’s alpha > 0.7. Finally, we administered the PPQr in a larger, independent sample of researchers to check the reliability of the revised version. Three components were identified as ‘stress’, ‘attitude’, and ‘resources’. We selected 3 × 6 = 18 items with high loadings in the three-component solution. Based on the convenience sample, Cronbach’s alphas were 0.83 for stress, 0.80 for attitude, and 0.76 for resources. We checked the validity of the PPQr by inspecting the correlations with the MBI and the WDQ. Stress correlated 0.62 with MBI’s emotional exhaustion. Resources correlated 0.50 with relevant WDQ subscales. To assess the internal structure of the PPQr in the independent reliability sample, we conducted the principal component analysis. The three-component solution explains 50% of the variance. Cronbach’s alphas were 0.80, 0.78, and 0.75 for stress, attitude, and resources, respectively. We conclude that the PPQr is a valid and reliable instrument to measure publication pressure in academic researchers from all disciplinary fields. The PPQr strongly relates to burnout and could also be beneficial for policy makers and research institutions to assess the degree of publication pressure in their institute.
Figures & Tables
  • References (42)
  • Citations (1)
References42
Newest
#1Tamarinde L. Haven (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 2
#2Joeri K. Tijdink (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 9
Last.Lex M. Bouter (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 140
view all 4 authors...
2 CitationsSource
#1Gunnar Aronsson (Stockholm University)H-Index: 28
#2Töres Theorell (KI: Karolinska Institutet)H-Index: 79
Last.Charlotte HallH-Index: 3
view all 9 authors...
58 CitationsSource
#1Ghazal S. Fazli (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 3
#2Maria I. Creatore (St. Michael's Hospital)H-Index: 14
Last.Gillian L. Booth (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 29
view all 8 authors...
31 CitationsSource
#1Katia Levecque (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 16
#2Frederik Anseel (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 22
Last.Lydia GisleH-Index: 7
view all 5 authors...
74 CitationsSource
#1Lex M. Bouter (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 140
#2Joeri K. Tijdink (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 9
Last.Riet ter G (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 45
view all 5 authors...
35 CitationsSource
#1H. de Witte (NWU: North-West University)H-Index: 52
#2Jaco Pienaar (NWU: North-West University)H-Index: 14
Last.Nele De Cuyper (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 38
view all 3 authors...
89 CitationsSource
#1Joeri K. Tijdink (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 9
#2A. C. M. VergouwenH-Index: 4
Last.Yvo M. Smulders (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 23
view all 3 authors...
26 CitationsSource
#1Joeri K. Tijdink (VUmc: VU University Medical Center)H-Index: 9
#2Reinout VerbekeH-Index: 1
Last.Yvo M. Smulders (VUmc: VU University Medical Center)H-Index: 39
view all 3 authors...
49 CitationsSource
#1Kristina Sundberg (KI: Karolinska Institutet)H-Index: 5
#2Hanna Frydén (KI: Karolinska Institutet)H-Index: 1
Last.Jonas Nordquist (KI: Karolinska Institutet)H-Index: 8
view all 4 authors...
7 CitationsSource
#1Tinne Vander Elst (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 15
#2H. de Witte (NWU: North-West University)H-Index: 52
Last.Nele De Cuyper (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 38
view all 3 authors...
75 CitationsSource
Cited By1
Newest
#1Tamarinde L. Haven (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 2
#2Lex M. Bouter (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 140
Last.Joeri K. Tijdink (VU: VU University Amsterdam)H-Index: 9
view all 4 authors...
1 CitationsSource