Four studies, two methods, one accident – An examination of the reliability and validity of Accimap and STAMP for accident analysis

Volume: 113, Pages: 310 - 317
Published: Mar 1, 2019
Abstract
The validity and reliability of human factors and safety science methods are some of the important criteria for judging their appropriateness and utility for accident analysis, however these are rarely assessed. The aim of this study is to take a closer look at the validity and reliability of two systemic accident analysis methods (Accimap and STAMP) by comparing the results of four studies which analysed the same accident (the South Korea Sewol...
Paper Details
Title
Four studies, two methods, one accident – An examination of the reliability and validity of Accimap and STAMP for accident analysis
Published Date
Mar 1, 2019
Volume
113
Pages
310 - 317
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.