Match!

Determining factors of interregional research collaboration in Germany's biotech network: Capacity, proximity, policy?

Published on Feb 1, 2019in Technovation5.25
· DOI :10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.001
Timo Mitze9
Estimated H-index: 9
(University of Southern Denmark),
Falk Strotebeck1
Estimated H-index: 1
Abstract
This paper analyses the determinants of link formation in Germany's biotech research network. Given the significance of regional clusters in the national biotech landscape, the modeling framework adopts a regional perspective and uses small-scale NUTS3 regions as nodes of the national biotech network. Linkages between nodes are measured by the number of active research collaborations between biotech actors located in these regions. The degree of the interregional collaboration activity between regional nodes is modeled as a function of the regions’ research and economic capabilities, the geographical distance between regions, and a set of policy variables. The empirical results from count data regressions show that link formation is significantly related to both node properties and the relationship between nodes. While locational factors such as regional high-tech start-up rates, the endowment with MINT employees and the population density as a broad measure for agglomeration economies are positively correlated with the extent of interregional research collaboration, distance acts an impediment to interregional collaboration. The results further show that the pursuit of network and cluster policies in the biotech sector, particularly through collaborative R&D funding, positively affects the strength of interregional collaboration activities.
  • References (48)
  • Citations (2)
References48
Newest
#1Timo Mitze (University of Southern Denmark)H-Index: 9
#2Falk StrotebeckH-Index: 1
1 CitationsSource
#1Ben R. Martin (University of Sussex)H-Index: 41
32 CitationsSource
#1Iris Wanzenböck (Austrian Institute of Technology)H-Index: 6
#2Thomas Scherngell (Austrian Institute of Technology)H-Index: 19
Last.Rafael Lata (Austrian Institute of Technology)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
24 CitationsSource
#1Tamás Krisztin (WU: Vienna University of Economics and Business)H-Index: 5
#2Manfred M. FischerH-Index: 39
13 CitationsSource
#1Tom Broekel (Leibniz University of Hanover)H-Index: 17
#2Dirk FornahlH-Index: 15
Last.Andrea Morrison (Bocconi University)H-Index: 19
view all 3 authors...
26 CitationsSource
#1Tom Broekel (Leibniz University of Hanover)H-Index: 17
29 CitationsSource
#1Iris Wanzenböck (Austrian Institute of Technology)H-Index: 6
#2Thomas Scherngell (Austrian Institute of Technology)H-Index: 19
Last.Thomas BrennerH-Index: 22
view all 3 authors...
37 CitationsSource
#1Cilem Selin Hazir (Jean Monnet University)H-Index: 4
#2Corinne Autant-Bernard (Jean Monnet University)H-Index: 12
12 CitationsSource
117 CitationsSource
#1Breandán Ó hUallacháin (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 16
#2Der-Shiuan Lee (CCU: Chinese Culture University)H-Index: 1
12 CitationsSource
Cited By2
Newest
#1Yindan Ye (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)
#2Kevin De Moortel (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)H-Index: 1
Last.Thomas Crispeels (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)H-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Timo Mitze (University of Southern Denmark)H-Index: 9
#2Falk StrotebeckH-Index: 1
1 CitationsSource