Development and testing of an analytic rubric for a master's course systematic review of the literature: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Conducting grading of systematic reviews in master's level programs of health sciences education is a complex process. Students conduct systematic reviews under the supervision of course faculty in seminar groups where both draft version and definite version of the literature review are graded/assessed. The aim of this study was to develop a systematic review of the literature rubric (SRL-rubric) for the evaluation of systematic...
Paper Details
Title
Development and testing of an analytic rubric for a master's course systematic review of the literature: A cross-sectional study
Published Date
Jan 1, 2018
Journal
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
72 - 72
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History