Match!

Indigenous water governance in Australia: comparisons with the United States and Canada

Published on Nov 13, 2018in Water2.524
· DOI :10.3390/w10111639
Julie H. Tsatsaros1
Estimated H-index: 1
,
Jennifer L. Wellman + 2 AuthorsPeter Valentine13
Estimated H-index: 13
Source
Abstract
Aboriginal participation in water resources decision making in Australia is similar when compared with Indigenous peoples' experiences in other common law countries such as the United States and Canada; however, this process has taken different paths. This paper provides a review of the literature detailing current legislative policies and practices and offers case studies to highlight and contrast Indigenous peoples' involvement in water resources planning and management in Australia and North America. Progress towards Aboriginal governance in water resources management in Australia has been slow and patchy. The U.S. and Canada have not developed consistent approaches in honoring water resources agreements or resolving Indigenous water rights issues either. Improving co-management opportunities may advance approaches to improve interjurisdictional watershed management and honor Indigenous participation. Lessons learned from this review and from case studies presented provide useful guidance for environmental managers aiming to develop collaborative approaches and co-management opportunities with Indigenous people for effective water resources management.
  • References (31)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
5 Authors (Sue Jackson, ..., Ian White)
72 Citations
1 Citations
2017
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References31
Newest
#1Martin Brueckner (Murdoch University)H-Index: 11
#2Marian EabrasuH-Index: 1
The ‘social license to operate’ (SLO) concept, whilst ubiquitous in industry and academia, to this day, continues to defy clear definition. This ambiguity encourages the proliferation of conflicting claims to such a license and complicates the assessment of their legitimacy. Observing that a dimension of SLO's ambiguity is normative, this paper seeks to explore this normativity aspect further, with a view to discerning the disagreements on what makes an SLO legitimate and what delegitimizes it. ...
3 CitationsSource
#1Nicole J. Wilson (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 5
#2Jody Inkster (U of A: University of Alberta)H-Index: 2
Indigenous peoples often view water as a living entity or a relative, to which they have a sacred responsibility. Such a perspective frequently conflicts with settler societies’ view of water as a “resource” that can be owned, managed, and exploited. Although rarely articulated explicitly, water conflicts are rooted in ontological differences between Indigenous and settler views of water. Furthermore, the unequal water governance landscape created by settler colonialism has perpetuated the suppr...
11 CitationsSource
Source
#1Barbara CosensH-Index: 15
#2Lance GundersonH-Index: 35
Last. Brian C. ChaffinH-Index: 13
view all 3 authors...
13 CitationsSource
#1Matthew Currell (RMIT: RMIT University)H-Index: 17
#2Adrian D. Werner (Flinders University)H-Index: 32
Last. Michael BerkmanH-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
Understanding and managing impacts from mining on groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs) and other groundwater users requires development of defensible science supported by adequate field data. This usually leads to the creation of predictive models and analysis of the likely impacts of mining and their accompanying uncertainties. The identification, monitoring and management of impacts on GDEs are often a key component of mine approvals, which need to consider and attempt to minimise the risks...
10 CitationsSource
#1Katherine Selena Taylor (ANU: Australian National University)H-Index: 1
#2Bradley Moggridge (UC: University of Canberra)H-Index: 4
Last. Anne Poelina (University of Notre Dame Australia)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
AbstractFirst Peoples are leading the conversation about Indigenous water rights policy in Australia. This paper reviews contemporary Aboriginal water policy and initiatives. We examine the ever-changing cycles of government action and inaction, and First Peoples’ responses. Three case studies: Strategic Indigenous Reserves in the Northern Territory, the First Peoples’ Water Engagement Council and the Fitzroy River Declaration illustrate: (1) First People’s expressions of the right to self-deter...
17 CitationsSource
#1Rosie Simms (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 1
#2Leila M. Harris (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 20
Last. Karen Bakker (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 32
view all 4 authors...
Abstract First Nations in British Columbia (BC), Canada, have historically been—and largely continue to be—excluded from colonial governments’ decision-making and management frameworks for fresh water. However, in light of recent legal and legislative changes, and also changes in water governance and policy, there is growing emphasis in scholarship and among legal, policy and advocacy communities on shifting water governance away from a centralized single authority towards an approach that is wa...
20 CitationsSource
#1Alana Grech (Macquarie University)H-Index: 19
#2Robert L. Pressey (JCU: James Cook University)H-Index: 74
Last. Jon C. Day (JCU: James Cook University)H-Index: 18
view all 3 authors...
The Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, Australia, covers over 348,000 km 2 of tropical marine ecosystems of global significance. In July 2015, the World Heritage Committee called attention to the cumulative impacts of climate change, poor water quality, and coastal development on the region's outstanding universal value, but stopped short of inscribing the Great Barrier Reef on the List of World Heritage in Danger. Restoring the region's values is hindered by an environmental decision-makin...
11 CitationsSource
#1Barbara Cosens (UM: University of Montana)H-Index: 15
#2Brian C. Chaffin (UIdaho: University of Idaho)H-Index: 13
Adaptive governance is an emergent phenomenon resulting from the interaction of locally driven collaborative efforts with a hierarchy of governmental regulation and management and is thought to be capable of navigating social−ecological change as society responds to the effects of climate change. The assertion of Native American water rights on highly developed water systems in North America has triggered governance innovations that resemble certain aspects of adaptive governance, and have emerg...
13 CitationsSource
#1E Lee (UTAS: University of Tasmania)H-Index: 4
"Protected areas" is the formal definition for the global network of conservation places, including marine and terrestrial reserves, which are overseen by the IUCN through instruments such as the Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories (Guidelines). In the long-term conservation of nature, the Guidelines embed a nature–culture dualism, upon which the values of each are ascribed and weighted. This binary does not recognise relational values of Indigenous peoples to land or en...
12 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest
ABSTRACTWater resources management is far from being sustainable, despite decades of scholarly work to improve the conceptual foundations of water management practice. Arguments have been provided ...
Source