Match!

Understanding Preference Imprecision

Published on Feb 1, 2020in Journal of Economic Surveys
· DOI :10.1111/JOES.12343
Oben K. Bayrak2
Estimated H-index: 2
,
John D. Hey32
Estimated H-index: 32
Abstract
The term ‘preference imprecision’ seems to have different meanings to different people. In the literature, one can find references to a number of expressions. For example: vagueness, incompleteness, randomness, unsureness, indecisiveness and thick indifference curves. Some of these are theoretical constructs, some are empirical. The purpose of this paper is to survey the various different approaches and to try to link them together: to see if they are all addressed to the same issue, and to come to some conclusions. In the course of this survey, we report on evidence concerning the existence of preference imprecision, and its impact on theoretical and empirical work.
  • References (79)
  • Citations (0)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
2016
1 Author (Oben K. Bayrak)
2014
3 Authors (Amel Ennaceur, ..., Eric Lefevre)
5 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References79
Newest
#1Daniel Navarro-Martinez (Barcelona Graduate School of Economics)H-Index: 8
#2Graham Loomes (Warw.: University of Warwick)H-Index: 42
Last. Larbi Alaoui (Barcelona Graduate School of Economics)H-Index: 3
view all 5 authors...
We build a satisficing model of choice under risk which embeds Expected Utility Theory (EUT) into a boundedly rational deliberation process. The decision maker accumulates evidence for and against alternative options by repeatedly sampling from her underlying set of EU preferences until the evidence favouring one option satisfies her desired level of confidence. Despite its EUT core, the model produces patterns of behaviour that violate standard EUT axioms, while at the same time capturing syste...
Source
#1Oben K. Bayrak (Umeå University)H-Index: 2
#2John D. Hey (Ebor: University of York)H-Index: 32
Source
#1Marina Agranov (California Institute of Technology)H-Index: 10
#2Pietro Ortoleva (Columbia University)H-Index: 12
We conduct an experiment in which subjects face the same questions repeated multiple times, with repetitions of two types: (1) following the literature, the repetitions are distant from each other; (2) in a novel treatment, the repetitions are in a row, and subjects are told that the questions will be repeated. We find that a large majority of subjects exhibit stochastic choice in both cases. We discuss the implications for models of stochastic choice.
34 CitationsSource
#1Mauricio Ribeiro (UnB: University of Brasília)H-Index: 1
#2Gil Riella (UnB: University of Brasília)H-Index: 6
Abstract In this article, we discuss some aspects of Eliaz and Ok ’s (Games Econ Behav 56:61–86, 2006) choice theoretical foundations of incomplete preferences. Our aim is to clarify some aspects of their regularity condition for preorders, showing that, as far as rationalization of a choice correspondence alone is concerned, no further restriction is imposed by requiring the preorder to be regular. However, if one is also interested in capturing other observable aspects of the individual’s choi...
3 CitationsSource
#1Hiroki Nishimura (UCR: University of California, Riverside)H-Index: 1
#2Efe A. Ok (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 29
The objective of this paper is to provide continuous utility representation theorems analogous to Debreu's classic utility representation theorem, albeit for preference relations that may fail to be complete and/or transitive. Specifically, we show that every (continuous and) reflexive binary relation on a (compact) metric space can be represented by means of the maxmin, or dually, minmax, of a (compact) set of (compact) sets of continuous utility functions. This notion of “maxmin multi-utility ...
4 CitationsSource
#1Elena Cettolin (Tilburg University)H-Index: 4
#2Arno Riedl (CES: Center for Economic Studies)H-Index: 28
The completeness axiom of choice has been questioned for long and theoretical models of decision making allowing for incomplete preferences have been developed. So far the theoretical accomplishments have not been paired with empirical evidence on the actual existence of incomplete preferences under uncertainty. We provide empirical evidence in support of the existence of incomplete preferences due to multiple priors over an ambiguous event, i.e. Bewley preferences. We design experimental decisi...
5 CitationsSource
#1Oben K. Bayrak (SLU: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)H-Index: 2
#2Bengt KriströmH-Index: 1
We extend the literature on the willingness-to-pay/willingness-to-accept (WTP/WTA) disparity by testing two hypotheses, distilled from the literature. We also introduce a modified mechanism for eliciting the subjective valuation range if the individual cannot articulate the subjective value as a precise amount confidently. Our key finding is that the disparity disappears under the intervals treatment, suggesting that response format is important, given that earlier experimental studies invariabl...
3 CitationsSource
#1Cathleen Johnson (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 13
#2Aurélien Baillon (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 12
Last. Peter P. Wakker (EUR: Erasmus University Rotterdam)H-Index: 51
view all 6 authors...
This paper introduces the Prince incentive system for measuring preferences. Prince clarifies consequences of decisions and incentive compatibility of experimental choice questions to subjects. It combines the efficiency and precision of matching with the improved clarity and validity of choice questions. It helps distinguish between (a) genuine deviations from classical economic theories (such as the endowment effect) and (b) preference anomalies due to fallible measurements (such as preference...
15 CitationsSource
#1Robin P. Cubitt (University of Nottingham)H-Index: 16
#2Daniel Navarro-Martinez (Barcelona Graduate School of Economics)H-Index: 8
Last. Chris Starmer (University of Nottingham)H-Index: 32
view all 3 authors...
Recent research invokes preference imprecision to explain violations of individual decision theory. While these inquiries are suggestive, the nature and significance of such imprecision remain poorly understood. We explore three questions using a new measurement tool in an experimental investigation of imprecision in lottery valuations: Does such preference imprecision vary coherently with lottery structure? Is it stable on repeat measurement? Does it have explanatory value for economic behaviou...
12 CitationsSource
#1Gil Riella (UnB: University of Brasília)H-Index: 6
Recently, there has been some interest on models of incomplete preferences under uncertainty that allow for incompleteness due the multiplicity of tastes and beliefs. In particular, Galaabaatar and Karni (Econometrica 81(1):255–284, 2013) work with a strict partial order and present axiomatizations of the Multi-prior Expected Multi-utility and the Single-prior Expected Multi-utility representations. In this paper, we characterize both models using a preorder as the primitive. In the case of the ...
5 CitationsSource
Cited By0
Newest