Match!

Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities

Published on Nov 19, 2018
· DOI :10.1108/AJIM-05-2018-0127
Tim C. E. Engels14
Estimated H-index: 14
(University of Antwerp),
Andreja Istenic Starcic8
Estimated H-index: 8
(Kazan: Kazan Federal University)
+ 2 AuthorsGunnar Sivertsen16
Estimated H-index: 16
Sources
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like “performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing” are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
  • References (37)
  • Citations (5)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
68 Citations
2018
2 Citations
31 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References37
Newest
#1Emanuel Kulczycki (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań)H-Index: 8
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine the characteristic patterns of monographs in the humanities, social sciences and hard sciences published by Polish scholars. The study provides a comprehensive overview of the Polish book evaluation system to explain how monographs are assessed and illustrate how changes in the definitions of the types of scholarly book publications influence publication patterns. Design/methodology/approach This paper analyses bibliographic records of 42,307 mon...
2 CitationsSource
#1Raf Guns (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 12
#2Linda Sīle (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 2
Last. Tim C. E. Engels (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 14
view all 5 authors...
We study the discrepancy between two ways of classifying publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH): on the basis of the contents of publications and publication channels (cognitive classification) or on the basis of the organizational structure of departments, faculties etc. (organizational classification). Using data for the period 2000–2015 from 76,076 peer reviewed publications (co-)authored by SSH researchers affiliated to a Flemish university, we compare the organizational cl...
4 CitationsSource
#1Emanuel Kulczycki (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań)H-Index: 8
#2Tim C. E. Engels (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 14
Last. Alesia Zuccala (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 14
view all 11 authors...
This study investigates patterns in the language and type of social sciences and humanities (SSH) publications in non-English speaking European countries to demonstrate that such patterns are related not only to discipline but also to each country’s cultural and historic heritage. We investigate publication patterns that occur across SSH publications of the whole of the SSH and of economics and business, law, and philosophy and theology publications in the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Fland...
27 CitationsSource
#1Carla BasiliH-Index: 1
#2Luca Lanzillo (Sapienza University of Rome)H-Index: 1
In the Italian context of research evaluation, research output in the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) presents problematic issues in classification, particularly for the Humanities. In the case of the Italian context, in fact, the SSH area features an extremely varied spectrum of disciplinary domains. The Italian national evaluation system for the Humanities applies a system in which research results are classified in correspondingly varied manner, based on the disciplinary affiliation of t...
8 CitationsSource
#1Geoffrey WilliamsH-Index: 2
#2Antonella Basso (Ca' Foscari University of Venice)H-Index: 11
Last. Tiziana Lippiello (Ca' Foscari University of Venice)H-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
While the idea that books are a fundamental channel of scientific communication for SSH scholars is recognized, little is known about the motivations that lead scholars to select books among various communication channels, and within books, among formats, audiences, and publishers. The chapter presents an analysis of publication data in two Italian universities (Ca′ Foscari and Macerata), integrated with qualitative data based on a survey and two focus groups. A rich set of findings sheds light ...
6 CitationsSource
#1Andrea Bonaccorsi (UniPi: University of Pisa)H-Index: 31
Controversies about research evaluation in SSH do not depend mainly on technical issues, such as coverage and reliability of indicators, but on deeper epistemic reasons. This chapter argues that entering into the way in which scientific communities produce valid knowledge is a promising avenue to make research evaluation legitimate and productive. The chapters, expanding a work initiated in a book, combine two levels of analysis: a historical reconstruction of the academic institutionalisation o...
4 CitationsSource
#1Björn Hammarfelt (UB: University of Borås)H-Index: 13
Purpose The publication oeuvre of a researcher carries great value when academic careers are assessed, and being recognised as a successful candidate is usually equated with being a productive author. Yet, how publications are valued in the context of evaluating careers is so far an understudied topic. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach Through a content analysis of assessment reports in three disciplines – biomedicine, economics and history – this paper analyses...
7 CitationsSource
Inspired by The Metric Tide report (2015) on the role of metrics in research assessment and management, and Lord Nicholas Stern’s report Building on Success and Learning from Experience (2016), which deals with criticisms of REF2014 and gives advice for a redesign of REF2021, this article discusses the possible implications for other countries. It also contributes to the discussion of the future of the REF by taking an international perspective. The article offers a framework for understanding d...
12 CitationsSource
#1Frederik T. Verleysen (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 9
#2Truyken L. B. Ossenblok (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 6
Scholarly monograph authors are compared to other authors, based on bibliographic data registered in the VABB-SHW database from Flanders (Belgium). Monograph authors are found to be most often established male researchers with high productivity, who are relatively less involved in research collaboration (co-authored publications) than are other authors. There exists a clear divergence between most of the individual social science disciplines, where monograph authors make up a marginal share of a...
4 CitationsSource
18 CitationsSource
Cited By5
Newest
#1Emanuel Kulczycki (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań)H-Index: 3
#1Emanuel Kulczycki (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań)H-Index: 8
Last. Przemyslaw Korytkowski (West Pomeranian University of Technology)H-Index: 8
view all 2 authors...
In this study, we investigate what share of researchers publish monographs across fields, gender and seniority. We acquired data from the Polish current research information system (POL-on) containing metadata of about 1,031,141 peer-reviewed publications from 67,415 Polish researchers, including 30,185 monographs from 2013 to 2016. The data are aggregated at the researcher level, which allows us to shed new light on publication patterns in all fields. We show that scholars who publish monograph...
Source
#1Emanuel Kulczycki (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań)H-Index: 3
#2Raf Guns (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 12
Last. Michal Petr (Masaryk University)
view all 11 authors...
1 CitationsSource
This timely volume illuminates the different forces underlying the shifting practices in humanities research today, with especial focus on how humanists take ownership of, and are empowered by, technology in unexpected ways. Digital Technology and th
Source
The rapid development of technology transforms the way researchers conduct projects, communicate with others, and disseminate findings. In addition to traditional presentations of research results, this paper argues that building a digital artifact is another optional method for the dissemination of research findings from the perspective of marketing. Thus, 20 Irish and Chinese micro-influencers were investigated from March 2016 to March 2019, and their microblogs were analyzed by text mining te...
Source
#1Yves Gingras (UQAM: Université du Québec à Montréal)H-Index: 34
#2Mahdi Khelfaoui (UQAM: Université du Québec à Montréal)H-Index: 1
1 CitationsSource
#1Maja JokićH-Index: 3
#2Andrea MervarH-Index: 1
Last. Stjepan MateljanH-Index: 1
view all 3 authors...
This study aims to assess the role of authored and edited books in scholarly communication through citation analysis. It focuses on social science journal articles written by authors from Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. The sample for book citation analysis were references (n = 1,033,926) from research articles (n = 35,501) published in 2726 journals indexed in Scopus, where at least one author was from a CEE country. The journals were classified in 10 social science fields (econom...
Source
#1Gunnar SivertsenH-Index: 1
Source
#1Raf Guns (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 12
#2Joshua Eykens (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 2
Last. Tim C. E. Engels (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 14
view all 3 authors...
This article presents a cohort analysis to study changes in the publication patterns of scholars working at a social sciences and humanities (SSH) university department or research unit in Flanders, Belgium. Starting from a comprehensive bibliographic database, we analyze the peer review status, publication language, publication type (journal article, book publication, or proceedings), and coverage in Web of Science (WoS) for publications produced between 2000 and 2014. Through a cohort analysis...
Source
#1Frederik T. Verleysen (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 9
#2Tim C. E. Engels (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 14
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present an empirical assessment of the weight assigned to monographs in the publication indicator of the performance-based research funding system (PRFS) in Flanders, Belgium. By relating publication weight to publication size the authors offer an alternative perspective on the production of scholars who publish monographs. This perspective on weights is linked to the aggregation level at which PRFS indicators are used: the national/regional one as opposed...
Source