Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities

Published on Nov 19, 2018
· DOI :10.1108/AJIM-05-2018-0127
Tim C. E. Engels13
Estimated H-index: 13
(University of Antwerp),
Andreja Istenič Starčič8
Estimated H-index: 8
(Kazan: Kazan Federal University)
+ 2 AuthorsGunnar Sivertsen14
Estimated H-index: 14
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like “performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing” are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
  • References (37)
  • Citations (5)
#1Raf Guns (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 10
#2Linda Sīle (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 1
Last.Tim C. E. Engels (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 13
view all 5 authors...
#1Emanuel Kulczycki (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań)H-Index: 7
#2Tim C. E. Engels (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 13
Last.Alesia Zuccala (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 13
view all 11 authors...
#1Geoffrey WilliamsH-Index: 2
#2Antonella Basso (Ca' Foscari University of Venice)H-Index: 10
Last.Tiziana Lippiello (Ca' Foscari University of Venice)H-Index: 2
view all 4 authors...
View next paperComprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: an empirical analysis of the potential