Why rational argument fails the genetic modification (GM) debate

Volume: 10, Issue: 5, Pages: 1145 - 1161
Published: Oct 1, 2018
Abstract
Genetic modification (GM) of crops provides a methodology for the agricultural improvements needed to deliver global food security. However, public opposition to GM-food is great. The debate has tended to risk communication, but here we show through study of a large nationally representative sample of British adults that public acceptance of GM-food has social, cultural and affective contexts. Regression models showed that metaphysical beliefs...
Paper Details
Title
Why rational argument fails the genetic modification (GM) debate
Published Date
Oct 1, 2018
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
1145 - 1161
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.