Match!

Abuse potential assessment of cannabidiol (CBD) in recreational polydrug users: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Published on Nov 1, 2018in Epilepsy & Behavior2.38
· DOI :10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.07.027
Kerri A. Schoedel12
Estimated H-index: 12
,
Isabella Szeto2
Estimated H-index: 2
+ 5 AuthorsKenneth W. Sommerville13
Estimated H-index: 13
Cite
Abstract
Abstract Rationale Treatment with a highly purified oral solution of cannabidiol (CBD), derived from the plant Cannabis sativa L., demonstrated some evidence of central nervous system (CNS)-related adverse events in patients enrolled in phase 3 trials for treatment of childhood-onset epilepsy. Cannabidiol was categorized as a Schedule 1 substance by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration; therefore, it was important to test CBD for human abuse potential. Methods This was a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled crossover trial. The abuse potential of single oral doses of plant-derived pharmaceutical formulations of highly purified CBD (Epidiolex®; 750 mg, 1500 mg, and 4500 mg) was compared with that of single oral doses of alprazolam (2 mg), dronabinol (10 mg and 30 mg), and placebo in healthy recreational polydrug users. The primary endpoint to assess abuse potential was the maximum effect (E max ) on Drug-Liking visual analog scale (VAS). Other measurements included E max on Overall Drug-Liking VAS, Take Drug Again VAS, positive and negative effects, other subjective effects, and Drug Similarity VAS. Cognitive and psychomotor functions were assessed using the Divided Attention Test, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—Revised, and the Digit–Symbol Substitution Task. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for CBD and its major metabolites. Standard safety measures and adverse events were assessed. Principal results Of 95 eligible subjects, 43 qualified for the treatment phase, received at least 1 dose of investigational medicinal product, and were included in safety assessments; 35 subjects were included in the pharmacodynamic analysis. Subjects receiving alprazolam and dronabinol had significantly higher Drug-Liking E max ( P P  = 0.51). Drug-Liking E max values for 1500-mg and 4500-mg CBD were significantly different from placebo ( P  = 0.04 and 0.002, respectively); however, the mean differences were  18-point differences between positive controls and placebo. Alprazolam and dronabinol had significantly higher Drug-Liking, Overall-Liking, and Take Drug Again VAS E max values compared with all doses of CBD ( P  ≤ 0.004). In contrast to alprazolam, CBD administration had no observable effect on cognitive/psychomotor tests. Pharmacokinetic parameters for CBD in this trial were consistent with previous studies. The majority of adverse events reported during the trial were of mild or moderate severity; no serious adverse events or deaths were reported. Conclusion Administration of a therapeutic dose of CBD (750 mg) showed significantly low abuse potential in a highly sensitive population of polydrug users. Although high and supratherapeutic doses of CBD (1500 mg and 4500 mg, respectively) had detectable subjective effects compared with placebo; the effects were significantly lower than those observed with alprazolam and dronabinol.
  • References (24)
  • Citations (1)
Cite
References24
Newest
#1Orrin Devinsky (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 81
#2Jh Cross (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 45
Last.Stephen Wright (GW Pharmaceuticals)H-Index: 7
view all 9 authors...
#1Shanna Babalonis (UK: University of Kentucky)H-Index: 8
#2Margaret Haney (CUMC: Columbia University Medical Center)H-Index: 47
Last.Sharon L. Walsh (UK: University of Kentucky)H-Index: 19
view all 7 authors...
Cited By1
Newest
#1Ewa Galaj (NIDA: National Institute on Drug Abuse)H-Index: 2
#2Zheng-Xiong Xi (NIDA: National Institute on Drug Abuse)H-Index: 40
#1Valentina Franco (UNIPV: University of Pavia)H-Index: 12
#2Emilio Perucca (UNIPV: University of Pavia)H-Index: 79
#1Ewa Galaj (NIDA: National Institute on Drug Abuse)H-Index: 2
#2Guo-Hua Bi (NIDA: National Institute on Drug Abuse)H-Index: 3
Last.Zheng-Xiong Xi (NIDA: National Institute on Drug Abuse)H-Index: 40
view all 4 authors...
#1Tom P. FreemanH-Index: 20
#2Chandni Hindocha (UCL: University College London)H-Index: 10
Last.Michael A P BloomfieldH-Index: 8
view all 4 authors...
View next paperRandomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator–controlled Crossover Study Evaluating the Abuse Potential of the Antiepileptic Drug Lacosamide in Healthy Recreational Drug Users