Match!

Trait correlation network analysis identifies biomass allocation traits and stem specific length as hub traits in herbaceous perennial plants

Published on Mar 1, 2019in Journal of Ecology5.69
· DOI :10.1111/1365-2745.13066
Michael Kleyer32
Estimated H-index: 32
(University of Oldenburg),
Juliane Trinogga4
Estimated H-index: 4
(University of Oldenburg)
+ 9 AuthorsBernd Blasius31
Estimated H-index: 31
(University of Oldenburg)
Abstract
1. Correlations among plant traits often reflect important trade‐offs or allometric relationships in biological functions like carbon gain, support, water uptake, and reproduction that are associated with different plant organs. Whether trait correlations can be aggregated to “spectra” or “leading dimensions,” whether these dimensions are consistent across plant organs, spatial scale, and growth forms are still open questions.2. To illustrate the current state of knowledge, we constructed a network of published trait correlations associated with the “leaf economics spectrum,” “biomass allocation dimension,” “seed dimension,” and carbon and nitrogen concentrations. This literature‐based network was compared to a network based on a dataset of 23 traits from 2,530 individuals of 126 plant species from 381 plots in Northwest Europe.3. The observed network comprised more significant correlations than the literature‐based network. Network centrality measures showed that size traits such as the mass of leaf, stem, below‐ground, and reproductive tissues and plant height were the most central traits in the network, confirming the importance of allometric relationships in herbaceous plants. Stem mass and stem‐specific length were “hub” traits correlated with most traits. Environmental selection of hub traits may affect the whole phenotype. In contrast to the literature‐based network, SLA and leaf N were of minor importance. Based on cluster analysis and subsequent PCAs of the resulting trait clusters, we found a “size” module, a “seed” module, two modules representing C and N concentrations in plant organs, and a “partitioning” module representing organ mass fractions. A module representing the plant economics spectrum did not emerge.4. Synthesis. Although we found support for several trait dimensions, the observed trait network deviated significantly from current knowledge, suggesting that previous studies have overlooked trait coordination at the whole‐plant level. Furthermore, network analysis suggests that stem traits have a stronger regulatory role in herbaceous plants than leaf traits.
  • References (88)
  • Citations (4)
References88
Newest
#1John G. HodgsonH-Index: 56
#2Bianca A. Santini (UNAM: National Autonomous University of Mexico)H-Index: 3
Last.Gemma WarhamH-Index: 2
view all 23 authors...
11 CitationsSource
#1Julie Messier (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 10
#2Martin J. Lechowicz (McGill University)H-Index: 46
Last.Brian J. Enquist (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 68
view all 5 authors...
31 CitationsSource
#1Wentao Luo (CAS: Chinese Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 11
#2Mai-He Li (CAS: Chinese Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 23
Last.Yong Jiang (CAS: Chinese Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 22
view all 9 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Kris R. Kramer-Walter (University of Waikato)H-Index: 2
#2Daniel C. Laughlin (UW: University of Wyoming)H-Index: 31
17 CitationsSource
#1Eric Garnier (University of Montpellier)H-Index: 54
#2Ulrike Stahl (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ)H-Index: 6
Last.Stefan Klotz (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ)H-Index: 47
view all 28 authors...
44 CitationsSource
#1Jennifer L. Funk (College of Science and Technology)H-Index: 24
#2Amelia A. Wolf (Columbia University)H-Index: 9
19 CitationsSource
#1Franciska T. de Vries (University of Manchester)H-Index: 25
#2Richard D. Bardgett (University of Manchester)H-Index: 94
29 CitationsSource
#1Catherine Roumet (University of Montpellier)H-Index: 32
#2Marine Birouste (University of Montpellier)H-Index: 2
Last.Alexia Stokes (INRA: Institut national de la recherche agronomique)H-Index: 39
view all 8 authors...
104 CitationsSource
#1Bill Shipley (Université de Sherbrooke)H-Index: 54
#2Francesco de Bello (Sewanee: The University of the South)H-Index: 43
Last.Peter B. Reich (University of Western Sydney)H-Index: 133
view all 6 authors...
122 CitationsSource
#1Enrique G. de la Riva (UCO: University of Córdoba (Spain))H-Index: 10
#2Manuel Olmo (UCO: University of Córdoba (Spain))H-Index: 10
Last.Rafael Villar (UCO: University of Córdoba (Spain))H-Index: 32
view all 5 authors...
48 CitationsSource
Cited By4
Newest
#1Guang-Qian Ren (Jiangsu University)
#2Qin Li (Jiangsu University)H-Index: 36
Last.Daolin Du (Jiangsu University)H-Index: 11
view all 12 authors...
Source
#1Habacuc Flores-Moreno (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 10
#2Farideh Fazayeli (UMN: University of Minnesota)H-Index: 9
Last.Peter B. Reich (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 133
view all 27 authors...
Source
#1Hendrik Poorter (Macquarie University)H-Index: 4
#2Ülo Niinemets (EMÜ: Estonian University of Life Sciences)H-Index: 80
Last.ThijsL. Pons (UU: Utrecht University)H-Index: 1
view all 7 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Sonia Paź-Dyderska (PAN: Polish Academy of Sciences)
#2Marcin K. Dyderski (PAN: Polish Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 9
Last.Andrzej M. Jagodziński (PAN: Polish Academy of Sciences)H-Index: 16
view all 6 authors...
Source