How can additional secondary data analysis of observational data enhance the generalisability of meta‐analytic evidence for local public health decision making?
Abstract
This paper critically explores how survey and routinely collected data could aid in assessing the generalisability of public health evidence. We propose developing approaches that could be employed in understanding the relevance of public health evidence, and investigate ways of producing meta‐analytic estimates tailored to reflect local circumstances, based on analyses of secondary data. Currently, public health decision makers face challenges...
Paper Details
Title
How can additional secondary data analysis of observational data enhance the generalisability of meta‐analytic evidence for local public health decision making?
Published Date
Oct 21, 2018
Journal
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
44 - 56
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History