Measuring relational and overt aggression by peer report: A comparison of peer nominations and peer ratings
Abstract
Peer report of aggression has typically been obtained through peer nominations. The purpose of this study was to identify the extent to which peer nominations and peer ratings identified the same children as aggressive and to explore whether the two methods were equally accurate in identifying children at risk for poor social adjustment. Participants were 1,051 students in third, fourth, or fifth grade and were predominantly African American...
Paper Details
Title
Measuring relational and overt aggression by peer report: A comparison of peer nominations and peer ratings
Published Date
Aug 23, 2018
Journal
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
362 - 374
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History