Match!

A review of environmental enrichment for laying hens during rearing in relation to their behavioral and physiological development

Published on Jan 1, 2019in Poultry Science2.03
· DOI :10.3382/ps/pey319
Dana L.M. Campbell9
Estimated H-index: 9
(UNE: University of New England (Australia)),
E.N. de Haas3
Estimated H-index: 3
(WUR: Wageningen University and Research Centre),
Caroline Lee21
Estimated H-index: 21
(UNE: University of New England (Australia))
Abstract
Globally, laying hen production systems are a focus of concern for animal welfare. Recently, the impacts of rearing environments have attracted attention, particularly with the trend toward more complex production systems including aviaries, furnished cages, barn, and free-range. Enriching the rearing environments with physical, sensory, and stimulatory additions can optimize the bird's development but commercial-scale research is limited. In this review, “enrichment” is defined as anything additional added to the bird's environment including structurally complex rearing systems. The impacts of enrichments on visual development, neurobehavioral development, auditory stimulation, skeletal development, immune function, behavioral development of fear and pecking, and specifically pullets destined for free-range systems are summarized and areas for future research identified. Visual enrichment and auditory stimulation may enhance neural development but specific mechanisms of impact and suitable commercial enrichments still need elucidating. Enrichments that target left/right brain hemispheres/behavioral traits may prepare birds for specific types of adult housing environments (caged, indoor, outdoor). Similarly, structural enrichments are needed to optimize skeletal development depending on the adult layer system, but specific physiological processes resulting from different types of exercise are poorly understood. Stimulating appropriate pecking behavior from hatch is critical but producers will need to adapt to different flock preferences to provide enrichments that are utilized by each rearing group. Enrichments have potential to enhance immune function through the application of mild stressors that promote adaptability, and this same principle applies to free-range pullets destined for variable outdoor environments. Complex rearing systems may have multiple benefits, including reducing fear, that improve the transition to the layer facility. Overall, there is a need to commercially validate positive impacts of cost-effective enrichments on bird behavior and physiology.
  • References (223)
  • Citations (3)
References223
Newest
#1Uwe Mayer (University of Trento)H-Index: 11
#2Rachel Bhushan (University of Trento)H-Index: 1
Last.Sang Ah Lee (KAIST)H-Index: 17
view all 4 authors...
7 CitationsSource
#1Dana L.M. CampbellH-Index: 9
#2Andrew C. TalkH-Index: 14
Last.Caroline G. L. LeeH-Index: 32
view all 5 authors...
4 CitationsSource
7 CitationsSource
#1Brooke N. Jenkins (Chapman University)H-Index: 7
#2John F. Hunter (UCI: University of California, Irvine)H-Index: 4
Last.Sarah D. Pressman (UCI: University of California, Irvine)H-Index: 17
view all 5 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Miriam Zepp (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 1
#2Helen Louton (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 4
Last.Angela Schwarzer (LMU: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)H-Index: 3
view all 6 authors...
11 CitationsSource
#1Isabelle Pettersson (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 3
#2Claire A Weeks (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 15
Last.Christine J Nicol (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 51
view all 5 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Isabelle Pettersson (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 3
#2Claire A Weeks (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 15
Last.Christine J Nicol (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 51
view all 4 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Dana L.M. Campbell (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 9
#2Ahmed B.A. Ali (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 5
Last.Janice M. Siegford (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 16
view all 4 authors...
4 CitationsSource
#1Mini Singh (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 8
#2Isabelle Ruhnke (UNE: University of New England (Australia))H-Index: 8
Last.Philip C. Glatz (South Australian Research and Development Institute)H-Index: 2
view all 7 authors...
8 CitationsSource
#1Isabelle Pettersson (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 3
#2Claire A Weeks (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 15
Last.Christine J Nicol (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 51
view all 3 authors...
3 CitationsSource
Cited By3
Newest
#1Kate I. Norman (UoB: University of Bristol)H-Index: 2
#2Jessie E.C Adriaense (UoB: University of Bristol)
Last.Christine J Nicol (RVC: Royal Veterinary College)H-Index: 51
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Julia MalchowH-Index: 1
#2Birger Puppe (University of Rostock)H-Index: 30
Last.Lars SchraderH-Index: 19
view all 4 authors...
Source
#2Caitlin DecinaH-Index: 1
view all 6 authors...
Source
View next paperRole of comparative psychology in the development of effective environmental enrichment strategies to improve poultry welfare