Inflated Clinical Evaluations: a Comparison of Faculty-Selected and Mathematically Calculated Overall Evaluations Based on Behaviorally Anchored Assessment Data

Volume: 43, Issue: 2, Pages: 151 - 156
Published: Aug 8, 2018
Abstract
This retrospective study compared faculty-selected evaluation scores with those mathematically calculated from behaviorally anchored assessments. Data from 1036 psychiatry clerkship clinical evaluations (2012–2015) was reviewed. These clinical evaluations required faculty to assess clinical performance using 14 behaviorally anchored questions followed by a faculty-selected overall evaluation. An explicit rubric was included in the overall...
Paper Details
Title
Inflated Clinical Evaluations: a Comparison of Faculty-Selected and Mathematically Calculated Overall Evaluations Based on Behaviorally Anchored Assessment Data
Published Date
Aug 8, 2018
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
151 - 156
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.