Controversy and Debate: Memory Based Methods Paper 3: Nutrition's ‘Black Swans’: Our reply
Abstract
We sincerely appreciate the response from our esteemed colleagues, Nerea Martín-Calvo and Miguel Ángel Martínez-González, and welcome the opportunity to continue the scientific discourse. Controversy and debate: Memory-Based Methods Paper 4Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyVol. 104PreviewWe appreciate the opportunity to end up this debate by rebutting the response by Edward Archer, Michael Marlow, and Carl Lavie. Once again, we want to show our...
Paper Details
Title
Controversy and Debate: Memory Based Methods Paper 3: Nutrition's ‘Black Swans’: Our reply
Published Date
Dec 1, 2018
Volume
104
Pages
130 - 135
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History