Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.

Adrian G. Barnett; Scott R. Glisson; Stephen A. Gallo

doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15479.2

doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15479.2

Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.

,

,

Volume: 7, Pages: 1030 - 1030

Published: Oct 15, 2018

Abstract

Background: Decisions about which applications to fund are generally based on the mean scores of a panel of peer reviewers. As well as the mean, a large disagreement between peer reviewers may also be worth considering, as it may indicate a high-risk application with a high return. Methods: We examined the peer reviewers' scores for 227 funded applications submitted to the American...

Paper Fields

Paper Details

Title

Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.

DOI

doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15479.2

Published Date

Oct 15, 2018

Journal

F1000Research

Volume

7

Pages

1030 - 1030

Citation AnalysisPro

You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro

Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?

Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.

Learn more

Notes

History