Toward a “.70” for Content Validity: Quantifying Standards for Definitional Correspondence

Volume: 2018, Issue: 1, Pages: 10156 - 10156
Published: Aug 1, 2018
Abstract
Several reviews have been critical of the content validity of scales used in applied psychology. Hinkin and Tracey’s (1999) technique–where naive raters gauge the degree to which scale items correspond to construct definitions–offers one quantitative approach to assessing content validity when new scales are introduced. Unfortunately, there is no clear standard–no proverbial “.70”–for judging whether definitional correspondence is adequate or...
Paper Details
Title
Toward a “.70” for Content Validity: Quantifying Standards for Definitional Correspondence
Published Date
Aug 1, 2018
Volume
2018
Issue
1
Pages
10156 - 10156
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.