Accelerating strategic fit or venture emergence: Different paths adopted by corporate accelerators

Published on Sep 1, 2019in Journal of Biomedical Informatics2.95
· DOI :10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.004
Raj K. Shankar2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India),
Dean A. Shepherd72
Estimated H-index: 72
(ND: University of Notre Dame)
Abstract Corporate accelerators (CAs) are a fast-emerging form of corporate engagement with startups. Equating them with independent startup accelerators and/or corporate venturing limits our understanding of how and why corporations run CA programs and to what end. In this inductive grounded theory study, we explore how corporations design and run CAs and to what effect. This study of four CAs reveals that corporations manage accelerators via one of two distinct processes: namely, accelerating strategic fit or accelerating venture emergence. Our inductive models of these corporate acceleration processes provide new insights into how CAs operate within corporations. Strategic posture and investment time horizon influence corporations' choice of acceleration path and their identification of potential ventures for acceleration. Our study deconstructs what comprises the core corporate acceleration processes and explains how the two pathways result in distinct outcomes—nurturing innovations or nurturing ecosystems. We believe these findings can open up rich research opportunities for understanding how corporations engage with entrepreneurial ventures to enhance their entrepreneurialness.
  • References (65)
  • Citations (3)
#1Michael A. Hitt (A&M: Texas A&M University)H-Index: 98
#2R. Duane Ireland (Baylor University)H-Index: 62
#1Robert K. Kazanjian (Emory University)H-Index: 15
#2Robert Drazin (Emory University)H-Index: 20
Last.Mary Ann Glynn (Emory University)H-Index: 32
view all 3 authors...
#1Dean A. Shepherd (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 72
#2Jeffery S. McMullen (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 24
Last.William Ocasio (NU: Northwestern University)H-Index: 24
view all 3 authors...
#1Arto Wallin (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland)H-Index: 5
#2Kaisa Still (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland)H-Index: 9
Last.Katja Henttonen (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland)H-Index: 6
view all 3 authors...
#1Charlotte Pauwels (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 1
#2Bart Clarysse (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 32
Last.Jonas Van Hove (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 5
view all 4 authors...
#1Brian S. Anderson (CU: University of Colorado Boulder)H-Index: 5
#2Patrick M. Kreiser (Iowa State University)H-Index: 16
Last.Yoshihiro Eshima (Osaka University of Economics)H-Index: 3
view all 5 authors...
Cited By3
#1Brian S. Anderson (UGent: Ghent University)H-Index: 5
#2Karl Wennberg (Linköping University)H-Index: 22
Last.Jeffery S. McMullen (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 24
view all 3 authors...
#1Christian E. Hampel (Imperial College London)H-Index: 3
#2Markus Perkmann (Imperial College London)H-Index: 22
Last.Nelson Phillips (Imperial College London)H-Index: 47
view all 3 authors...
View next paperCorporate venturing: Insights from actual performance