Questioning the Shanghai Ranking methodology as a tool for the evaluation of universities: an integrative review
Abstract
This integrative review reports on methodological questions about the Shanghai Ranking as a tool for the evaluation of universities, questions that are extensible to other rankings. The paper presents a list of methodological problems that are the result of both a review of the literature and the authors’ knowledge, with the aim of improving and refining the ranking in line with the Berlin Principles. The second section makes proposals and...
Paper Details
Title
Questioning the Shanghai Ranking methodology as a tool for the evaluation of universities: an integrative review
Published Date
Jun 26, 2018
Journal
Volume
116
Issue
3
Pages
2069 - 2083
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History