Published on Jan 1, 2018in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care1.418
· DOI :10.1017/S0266462318000302
Andres Pichon-Riviere14
Estimated H-index: 14
Natalie Soto5
Estimated H-index: 5
+ 1 AuthorsLaura Sampietro-Colom14
Estimated H-index: 14
Objectives: Latin American countries are taking important steps to expand and strengthen universal health coverage, and health technology assessment (HTA) has an increasingly prominent role in this process. Participation of all relevant stakeholders has become a priority in this effort. Key issues in this area were discussed during the 2017 Latin American Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) Policy Forum. Methods: The Forum included forty-one participants from Latin American HTA agencies; public, social security, and private insurance sectors; and the pharmaceutical and medical device industry. A background paper and presentations by invited experts and Forum members supported discussions. This study presents a summary of these discussions. Results: Stakeholder involvement in HTA remains inconsistently implemented in the region and few countries have established formal processes. Participants agreed that stakeholder involvement is key to improve the HTA process, but the form and timing of such improvements must be adapted to local contexts. The legitimization of both HTA and decision-making processes was identified as one of the main reasons to promote stakeholder involvement; but to be successful, the entire system of assessment and decision making must be properly staffed and organized, and certain basic conditions must be met, including transparency in the HTA process and a clear link between HTA and decision making. Conclusions: Participants suggested a need for establishing clear rules of participation in HTA that would protect HTA producers and decision makers from potentially distorting external influences. Such rules and mechanisms could help foster trust and credibility among stakeholders, supporting actual involvement in HTA processes.
  • References (10)
  • Citations (2)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
10 Citations
6 Citations
28 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
OBJETIVO: Identificar los principios de buenas practicas en la Evaluacion de las Tecnologias Sanitarias (ETESA) mas relevantes, aplicables y prioritarios en Latinoamerica; y las potenciales barreras para implementarlos en la region. METODOS: Foram identificados os principios das boas praticas na ATS propostos ao nivel mundial e explorados em um processo deliberativo em um forum de examinadores, financiadores e produtores de tecnologia. RESULTADOS: El Foro conto con la participacion de 42 represe...
3 Citations
textabstractPriority setting of health interventions is generally considered as a valuable approach to support low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in their strive for universal health coverage (UHC). However, present initiatives on priority setting are mainly geared towards the development of more cost-effectiveness information, and this evidence does not sufficiently support countries to make optimal choices. The reason is that priority setting is in reality a value-laden political process...
28 CitationsSource
Over the past three decades, many countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have recognized health as a human right. Since the early 2000s, 46 million more people in the countries studied are covered by health programs with explicit entitlements to care. Reforms have been accompanied by a rise in public spending for health, financed largely by general revenues that prioritize or explicitly target the population without capacity to pay. Political commitment has generally translated into larger...
15 CitationsSource
#1Federico Augustovski (UBA: University of Buenos Aires)H-Index: 25
#2Andrea AlcarazH-Index: 6
Last. Andres Pichon-Riviere (UBA: University of Buenos Aires)H-Index: 14
view all 5 authors...
10 CitationsSource
#1Andres Pichon-Riviere (UBA: University of Buenos Aires)H-Index: 14
#2Federico Augustovski (Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires)H-Index: 25
Last. Michael Drummond (Ebor: University of York)H-Index: 72
view all 6 authors...
Objectives: A set of fifteen key principles (KP) has been recently proposed to guide decisions on the structure of HTA programs, the methods of HTA, the processes for conducting HTA and the use of HTA findings in decision-making. The objective of this research is to explore whether these KPs are relevant and useful in Latin America (LA), and to what extent they are being applied. Methods: A Web-based survey was sent to 11,792 HTA researchers and users in LA to explore the perceived relevance of ...
28 CitationsSource
#1Michael Drummond (Ebor: University of York)H-Index: 72
#2J. Sanford Schwartz (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 61
Last. Sean D. Sullivan (UW: University of Washington)H-Index: 65
view all 7 authors...
Health technology assessment (HTA) is a dynamic, rapidly evolving process, embracingdifferent types of assessments that inform real-world decisions about the value (i.e.,benefits, risks, and costs) of new and existing technologies. Historically, most HTAagencies have focused on producing high quality assessment reports that can be used bya range of decision makers. However, increasingly organizations are undertaking orcommissioning HTAs to inform a particular resource allocation decision, such as...
257 CitationsSource
“Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessment for resource allocation decisions.” The title says it all. I am amazed that such a summary is even possible and that it defines this field so well. Perhaps this report will be cited for years to come as the best and central definition of HTA. A field like this can be defined in other ways.
5 CitationsSource
#1Markus SiebertH-Index: 1
#2Louis Christian Clauss (Baxter International)H-Index: 1
Last. Antoinette Wenk Lang (Boston Scientific Corporation)H-Index: 1
view all 10 authors...
Objective: To inform about the specifics of medical devices and the resulting consequences for health technology assessment (HTA) and to present the European industry position on this topic. Methods: The paper is based on an intensive debate within Eucomed, the European trade association in the field of medical devices, informed by an HTA Experts Group, comprising experts from within and outside the medical device industry. Results: Based on the specifics of medical devices, there are a number o...
31 Citations
Healthcare (including public health) is special because it protects normal functioning, which in turn protects the range of opportunities open to individuals. I extend this account in two ways. First, since the distribution of goods other than healthcare affect population health and its distribution, I claim that Rawls's principles of justice describe a fair distribution of the social determinants of health, giving a partial account of when health inequalities are unjust. Second, I supplement a ...
230 CitationsSource
All health systems struggle with the issue of meeting population health needs fairly under resource constraints. Decisions about the implementation of new technologies provide a useful window into the larger issue, and a paper in this week's journal provides a valuable insight into the elements of decision making that decision makers themselves think important in trying to reach fair decisions on applying new technologies in health care.1 In mixed systems, like that in the United States, decisio...
402 CitationsSource
Cited By2
OBJECTIVES: In the last two decades, several countries in Latin America (LA) have shown an interest in developing health technology assessments (HTAs), but the process has not been uniform and has often been challenged by the health systems characteristics and the political or economic idiosyncrasies of these countries. METHODS: This article summarizes the discussions held by the participants at the 40th International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) HTA Council Roundt...
Background Evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) were recently introduced to guide health technology assessment (HTA) agencies to improve their processes towards more legitimate decision-making. The EDP framework provides guidance that covers the HTA process, ie, contextual factors, installation of an appraisal committee, selecting health technologies and criteria, assessment, appraisal, and communication and appeal. The aims of this study were to identify the level of use of EDPs by H...
Objectives The recent development of value frameworks to inform healthcare resource allocation responds to a demand to make the decision-making process more inclusive and explicit. The objectives of the 2018 Latin American (LAtam) Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) Policy Forum were to explore the current international experiences and to discuss the potential application of value frameworks in Latin America. Methods A background paper, presentations, and group discussions of Polic...
1 CitationsSource