Match!

Phylogenomics clarifies repeated evolutionary origins of inbreeding and fungus farming in bark beetles (Curculionidae, Scolytinae)

Published on Oct 1, 2018in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution3.99
· DOI :10.1016/j.ympev.2018.05.028
Andrew J. Johnson3
Estimated H-index: 3
(UF: University of Florida),
Duane D. McKenna17
Estimated H-index: 17
(U of M: University of Memphis)
+ 5 AuthorsJiri Hulcr27
Estimated H-index: 27
(UF: University of Florida)
View in Source
Abstract
Abstract Bark and ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae, Scolytinae) display a conspicuous diversity of unusual genetic and ecological attributes and behaviors. Reconstructing the evolution of Scolytinae, particularly the large and ecologically significant tribe Cryphalini (pygmy borers), has long been problematic. These challenges have not adequately been addressed using morphological characters, and previous research has used only DNA sequence data from small numbers of genes. Through a combination of anchored hybrid enrichment, low-coverage draft genomes, and transcriptomes, we addressed these challenges by amassing a large molecular phylogenetic dataset for bark and ambrosia beetles. The resulting DNA sequence data from 251 protein coding genes (114,276 bp of nucleotide sequence data) support inference of the first robust phylogeny of Scolytinae, with a special focus on the species rich tribe Cryphalini and its close relatives. Key strategies, including inbreeding mating systems and fungus farming, evolved repeatedly across Scolytinae. We confirm 12 of 16 hypothesized origins of fungus farming, 6 of 8 origins of inbreeding polygyny and at least 11 independent origins of a super-generalist host range. These three innovations are statistically correlated, but their appearance within lineages was not necessarily simultaneous. Additionally, the evolution of extreme host plant generalism often preceded, rather than succeeded, fungus farming. Of the high-diversity tribes of Scolytinae, only Xyleborini is monophyletic, Corthylini is paraphyletic and Cryphalini is highly polyphyletic. Cryphalini sensu stricto is part of a clade containing the genera Hypothenemus , Cryphalus and Trypophloeus , and the tribe Xyloterini. Stegomerus and Cryptocarenus (Cryphalini) are part of a clade otherwise containing all Corthylini. Several other genera, including Ernoporus and Scolytogenes (Cryphalini), make up a distantly related clade. Several of the genera of Cryphalini are also intermixed. For example, Cryphalus and Hypocryphalus are intermingled, as well as Ernoporicus , Ptilopodius and Scolytogenes . Our data are consistent with widespread polyphyly and paraphyly across Scolytinae and within Cryphalini, and provides new insights into the evolution of inbreeding mating systems and fungus farming in the species rich and ecologically significant weevil subfamily Scolytinae.
  • References (68)
  • Citations (6)
References68
Newest
#1James Skelton (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 9
#2Michelle A. JusinoH-Index: 7
Last.Jiri Hulcr (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 27
view all 8 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Seunggwan Shin (U of M: University of Memphis)H-Index: 7
#2Dave J. Clarke (U of M: University of Memphis)H-Index: 6
Last.Duane D. McKenna (U of M: University of Memphis)H-Index: 17
view all 10 authors...
26 CitationsSource
#1Dario Pistone (University of Bergen)H-Index: 3
#2Jostein Gohli (University of Bergen)H-Index: 6
Last.Bjarte H. Jordal (University of Bergen)H-Index: 22
view all 3 authors...
3 CitationsSource
#1Duane D. McKenna (U of M: University of Memphis)H-Index: 17
9 CitationsSource
#1Stephanie Haddad (U of M: University of Memphis)H-Index: 4
#2Seunggwan Shin (U of M: University of Memphis)H-Index: 7
Last.Duane D. McKenna (U of M: University of Memphis)H-Index: 17
view all 9 authors...
15 CitationsSource
#1Caroline Storer (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 5
#2Adam C. Payton (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 5
Last.Jiri Hulcr (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 27
view all 5 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Jostein Gohli (University of Bergen)H-Index: 6
#2Lawrence R. Kirkendall (University of Bergen)H-Index: 22
Last.Bjarte H. Jordal (University of Bergen)H-Index: 22
view all 6 authors...
16 CitationsSource
55 CitationsSource
#1Dan L. Warren (Macquarie University)H-Index: 17
#2Anthony J. Geneva (Harvard University)H-Index: 12
Last.Robert Lanfear (Macquarie University)H-Index: 29
view all 3 authors...
65 CitationsSource
#1Andrew J. Johnson (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 3
#2Thomas H. Atkinson (University of Texas at Austin)H-Index: 4
Last.Jiri Hulcr (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 27
view all 3 authors...
1 CitationsSource
Cited By6
Newest
#1Kevin Paul Johnson (INHS: Illinois Natural History Survey)H-Index: 40
Source
Last.Anthony I. Cognato (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 23
view all 4 authors...
Source
Last.Enrique Ibarra-LacletteH-Index: 22
view all 14 authors...
Source
#1Dave J. ClarkeH-Index: 6
#2Ajay LimayeH-Index: 1
Last.Rolf G. OberprielerH-Index: 11
view all 4 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1You Li (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 4
#2Yong‐Ying Ruan (SZPT: Shenzhen Polytechnic)H-Index: 1
Last.Jiri Hulcr (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 27
view all 8 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Duane D. McKenna (U of M: University of Memphis)H-Index: 17
#2Dave J. Clarke (U of M: University of Memphis)H-Index: 6
Last.Guanyang Zhang (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 1
view all 25 authors...
3 CitationsSource
View next paperGenetics of Bark Beetles and Associated Microorganisms: Third Workshop Proceedings