Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis

Volume: 79, Pages: 64 - 70
Published: Nov 1, 2018
Abstract
Prosociality is fundamental to human social life, and, accordingly, much research has attempted to explain human prosocial behavior. Capraro and Rand (Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 99–111, 2018) recently provided experimental evidence that prosociality in anonymous, one-shot interactions (such as Prisoner's Dilemma and Dictator Game experiments) is not driven by outcome-based social preferences – as classically assumed – but by a generalized...
Paper Details
Title
Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis
Published Date
Nov 1, 2018
Volume
79
Pages
64 - 70
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.