Match!

Environment vs. Plant Ontogeny: Arthropod Herbivory Patterns on European Beech Leaves along the Vertical Gradient of Temperate Forests in Central Germany

Published on Jan 26, 2018in Insects
· DOI :10.3390/insects9010009
Stephanie Stiegel1
Estimated H-index: 1
,
Jasmin Mantilla-Contreras8
Estimated H-index: 8
Abstract
Environmental and leaf trait effects on herbivory are supposed to vary among different feeding guilds. Herbivores also show variability in their preferences for plant ontogenetic stages. Along the vertical forest gradient, environmental conditions change, and trees represent juvenile and adult individuals in the understorey and canopy, respectively. This study was conducted in ten forests sites in Central Germany for the enrichment of canopy research in temperate forests. Arthropod herbivory of different feeding traces was surveyed on leaves of Fagus sylvatica Linnaeus (European beech; Fagaceae) in three strata. Effects of microclimate, leaf traits, and plant ontogenetic stage were analyzed as determining parameters for herbivory. The highest herbivory was caused by exophagous feeding traces. Herbivore attack levels varied along the vertical forest gradient for most feeding traces with distinct patterns. If differences of herbivory levels were present, they only occurred between juvenile and adult F. sylvatica individuals, but not between the lower and upper canopy. In contrast, differences of microclimate and important leaf traits were present between the lower and upper canopy. In conclusion, the plant ontogenetic stage had a stronger effect on herbivory than microclimate or leaf traits along the vertical forest gradient.
  • References (49)
  • Citations (1)
References49
Newest
#1Mikhail V. Kozlov (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 4
#2Vitali Zverev (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 13
Last.Elena L. Zvereva (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 22
view all 3 authors...
8 CitationsSource
#1Adam J. VanbergenH-Index: 29
#2Ben A. WoodcockH-Index: 33
Last.Daniel S. ChapmanH-Index: 21
view all 4 authors...
17 CitationsSource
#1Stephanie StiegelH-Index: 1
#2Martin H. EntlingH-Index: 19
view all 3 authors...
5 CitationsSource
#1Mikhail V. Kozlov (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 31
#2Elena L. Zvereva (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 22
13 CitationsSource
#1C.M.S. Smith (Lincoln University (New Zealand))H-Index: 2
#2Mike H. Bowie (Lincoln University (New Zealand))H-Index: 10
Last.N. Dickinson (Lincoln University (New Zealand))H-Index: 2
view all 10 authors...
11 CitationsSource
#1Martin M. Gossner (TUM: Technische Universität München)H-Index: 26
#2Esther Pašalić (FSU: University of Jena)H-Index: 10
Last.Wolfgang W. Weisser (TUM: Technische Universität München)H-Index: 61
view all 11 authors...
10 CitationsSource
6 CitationsSource
#1Jared G. Ali (Cornell University)H-Index: 14
#2Anurag A. Agrawal (Cornell University)H-Index: 75
345 CitationsSource
#1Michael D. Ulyshen (USFS: United States Forest Service)H-Index: 25
78 CitationsSource
#1Elena L. Zvereva (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 22
#2Vojtěch Lanta (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 13
Last.Mikhail V. Kozlov (UTU: University of Turku)H-Index: 31
view all 3 authors...
96 CitationsSource
Cited By1
Newest
Source