Match!

Double-stranded DNA break polarity skews repair pathway choice during intrachromosomal and interchromosomal recombination

Published on Mar 13, 2018in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America9.58
· DOI :10.1073/pnas.1720962115
Alexanda K. Ling3
Estimated H-index: 3
(U of T: University of Toronto),
Clare C. So3
Estimated H-index: 3
(U of T: University of Toronto)
+ 3 AuthorsAlberto Martin24
Estimated H-index: 24
(U of T: University of Toronto)
Cite
Abstract
Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) inflicts DNA damage at Ig genes to initiate class switch recombination (CSR) and chromosomal translocations. However, the DNA lesions formed during these processes retain an element of randomness, and thus knowledge of the relationship between specific DNA lesions and AID-mediated processes remains incomplete. To identify necessary and sufficient DNA lesions in CSR, the Cas9 endonuclease and nickase variants were used to program DNA lesions at a greater degree of predictability than is achievable with conventional induction of CSR. Here we show that Cas9-mediated nicks separated by up to 250 nucleotides on opposite strands can mediate CSR. Staggered double-stranded breaks (DSBs) result in more end resection and junctional microhomology than blunt DSBs. Moreover, Myc - Igh chromosomal translocations, which are carried out primarily by alternative end joining (A-EJ), were preferentially induced by 5′ DSBs. These data indicate that DSBs with 5′ overhangs skew intrachromosomal and interchromosomal end-joining toward A-EJ. In addition to lending potential insight to AID-mediated phenomena, this work has broader carryover implications in DNA repair and lymphomagenesis.
  • References (50)
  • Citations (3)
Cite
References50
Newest
#1Hong Zan (University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio)H-Index: 5
#2Connie Tat (University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio)H-Index: 3
Last.Paolo CasaliH-Index: 54
view all 7 authors...
#1Dylan A. Reid (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 8
#2Michael P. Conlin (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 5
Last.Eli Rothenberg (NYU: New York University)H-Index: 17
view all 8 authors...
#1Howard H. Y. Chang (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 7
#2Go Watanabe (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 7
Last.Michael R. Lieber (SC: University of Southern California)H-Index: 78
view all 7 authors...
#1Megan Van Overbeek (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 1
#2Daniel Capurso (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 2
Last.Bastien Vidal (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 2
view all 10 authors...
#1Lianne E.M. Vriend (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 6
#2Rohit Prakash (MSK: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)H-Index: 4
Last.Przemek M. Krawczyk (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 15
view all 8 authors...
#1Dania Haddad (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 5
#2Conglei Li (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 12
Last.Alberto Martin (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 24
view all 10 authors...
#1Zhuobin Liang (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 4
#2Sham Sunder (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 4
Last.Thomas E. Wilson (UM: University of Michigan)H-Index: 31
view all 4 authors...
View next paperDSB structure impacts DNA recombination leading to class switching and chromosomal translocations in human B cells