Match!

Larregue’s Critique of Cofnas et al. (2017): A Rejoinder

Published on Jun 1, 2018in The American Sociologist
· DOI :10.1007/s12108-018-9372-6
Nathan Cofnas5
Estimated H-index: 5
(Balliol College),
Noah Carl8
Estimated H-index: 8
(Nuffield College)
Abstract
Data from the General Social Survey indicate that conservatives’ self-reported trust in scientists has steadily decreased since 1974. In Cofnas et al. (The American Sociologist, 2017), we suggested that this trend may have been partly driven by the increasing tendency of scientific institutions, and the representatives of such institutions, to distort social science for the sake of liberal activism. Larregue (The American Sociologist, 2017) makes three opposing arguments: (1) It is “very hard” to establish the charge of bias, especially since we did “not state what [we] mean by ‘bias.’” (2) We did not establish a causal relationship between scientists’ (alleged) liberal activism and conservatives’ distrust of science, and we ignored activism by conservative scientists. (3) We were wrong to advocate “affirmative action” for conservatives in academia. We address these arguments in turn: (1) Larregue does not engage with our main arguments that liberal bias exists in social science. (2) In recent years, prominent scientific organizations have, with great publicity, intervened in policy debates, always supporting the liberal side without exception. It is not unreasonable to assume that this would diminish conservatives’ trust in these organizations. Contra Larregue, in Cofnas et al. (The American Sociologist, 2017) we explicitly acknowledged that conservative scientists can also be biased. (3) We never advocated “affirmative action” for conservatives, and in fact we object to such a proposal.
  • References (10)
  • Citations (1)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1993
5 Authors (Roger Undy, ..., Paul Smith)
12 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References10
Newest
#1Julien Larregue (UQAM: Université du Québec à Montréal)H-Index: 2
An article recently published in The American Sociologist argued that social scientists are biased because of their liberal views, and that this social activism might in turn explain the growing distrust of conservatives in the scientific community observed in the General Social Survey. Although I do agree that social scientists in the United States are mostly liberal, which is hard to contest given the accumulated evidence, this does not necessarily mean that liberal scientists are biased. It i...
3 CitationsSource
#1Nathan Cofnas (Balliol College)H-Index: 5
#2Noah Carl (Nuffield College)H-Index: 8
Data from the General Social Survey suggest that conservatives have become less trustful of scientists since the 1970s. Gauchat argues that this is because conservatives increasingly see scientific findings as threatening to their worldview. However, the General Social Survey data concern trust in scientists, not in science. We suggest that conservatives’ diminishing trust in scientists reflects the fact that scientists in certain fields, particularly social science, have increasingly adopted a ...
8 CitationsSource
#1Nathan Honeycutt (SDSU: San Diego State University)H-Index: 1
#2Laura A. Freberg (California Polytechnic State University)H-Index: 6
Inbar and Lammers asked members of APA Division 8 (personality and social psychology) about their political orientation, hostility experienced related to their political orientation, and their willingness to discriminate against others based on perceived political orientation. In this replication and extension, 618 faculty members from various academic disciplines across four California State University campuses completed an online questionnaire that added parallel questions about the liberal ex...
8 CitationsSource
#1Richard D. Lane (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 13
#2T Lee Ryan (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 26
Last. Leslie S. Greenberg (York University)H-Index: 58
view all 4 authors...
Since Freud, clinicians have understood that disturbing memories contribute to psychopathology and that new emotional experiences contribute to therapeutic change. Yet, controversy remains about what is truly essential to bring about psychotherapeutic change. Mounting evidence from empirical studies suggests that emotional arousal is a key ingredient in therapeutic change in many modalities. In addition, memory seems to play an important role but there is a lack of consensus on the role of under...
165 CitationsSource
#1Jose L. Duarte (ASU: Arizona State University)H-Index: 4
#2Jarret T. Crawford (TCNJ: The College of New Jersey)H-Index: 19
Last. Philip E. Tetlock (UPenn: University of Pennsylvania)H-Index: 75
view all 6 authors...
Psychologists have demonstrated the value of diversity – particularly diversity of viewpoints – for enhancing creativity, discovery, and problem solving. But one key type of viewpoint diversity is lacking in academic psychology in general and social psychology in particular: political diversity. This article reviews the available evidence and finds support for four claims: (1) Academic psychology once had considerable political diversity, but has lost nearly all of it in the last 50 years. (2) T...
137 CitationsSource
#1Aaron M. McCright (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 31
#2Katherine Dentzman (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 4
Last. Thomas Dietz (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 56
view all 4 authors...
In recent years, some scholars, journalists, and science advocates have promoted broad claims that ‘conservatives distrust science’ or ‘conservatives oppose science’. We argue that such claims may oversimplify in ways that lead to empirical inaccuracies. The Anti-Reflexivity Thesis suggests a more nuanced examination of how political ideology influences views about science. The Anti-Reflexivity Thesis hypothesizes that some sectors of society mobilize to defend the industrial capitalist order fr...
58 CitationsSource
#1Alba Argerich (OSU: Oregon State University)H-Index: 14
#2Sherri L. Johnson (USFS: United States Forest Service)H-Index: 32
Last. G. G. IceH-Index: 1
view all 12 authors...
To examine whether stream nitrogen concentrations in forested reference catchments have changed over time and if patterns were consistent across the USA, we synthesized up to 44 yr of data collected from 22 catchments at seven USDA Forest Service Experimental Forests. Trends in stream nitrogen presented high spatial variability both among catchments at a site and among sites across the USA. We found both increasing and decreasing trends in monthly flow-weighted stream nitrate and ammonium concen...
28 CitationsSource
#1Neil GrossH-Index: 10
Some observers see American academia as a bastion of leftist groupthink that indoctrinates students and silences conservative voices. Others see a protected enclave that naturally produces free-thinking, progressive intellectuals. Both views are self-serving, says Neil Gross, but neither is correct. Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? explains how academic liberalism became a self-reproducing phenomenon, and why Americans on both the left and right should take notice. Acade...
57 Citations
#1Yoel Inbar (Tilburg University)H-Index: 20
#2J. Lammers (Tilburg University)H-Index: 18
A lack of political diversity in psychology is said to lead to a number of pernicious outcomes, including biased research and active discrimination against conservatives. We surveyed a large number (combined N = 800) of social and personality psychologists and discovered several interesting facts. First, although only 6% described themselves as conservative “overall,” there was more diversity of political opinion on economic issues and foreign policy. Second, respondents significantly underestim...
115 CitationsSource
#1Gordon Gauchat (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 11
This study explores time trends in public trust in science in the United States from 1974 to 2010. More precisely, I test Mooney’s (2005) claim that conservatives in the United States have become increasingly distrustful of science. Using data from the 1974 to 2010 General Social Survey, I examine group differences in trust in science and group-specific change in these attitudes over time. Results show that group differences in trust in science are largely stable over the period, except for resp...
372 CitationsSource
Cited By1
Newest
#1Julien Larregue (UQAM: Université du Québec à Montréal)H-Index: 2
Source