Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications

Volume: 38, Issue: 2, Pages: 216 - 229
Published: Feb 24, 2018
Abstract
The process of peer review is used to identify the most scientifically meritorious research projects for funding. Impact and innovation are among the criteria used to determine overall merit. A criticism of peer review has been the perception that reviewers are biased against innovation, such as one study that found reviewers to systematically assign poorer scores to highly novel work. Moreover, reviewers’ definitions for excellent research and...
Paper Details
Title
Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications
Published Date
Feb 24, 2018
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
216 - 229
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.