Supporting replication research in management journals: Qualitative analysis of editorials published between 1970 and 2015
Abstract
Management literature may be populated by studies that report exaggerated levels of significance, and one potential solution to this problem is providing support for replication research. Drawing on the analysis of editorials published by top management journals between 1970 and 2015, I show how the issue of replication research was framed and discussed and how policy toward replication research was communicated to the readers. Only 67 of 1901...
Paper Details
Title
Supporting replication research in management journals: Qualitative analysis of editorials published between 1970 and 2015
Published Date
Feb 1, 2019
Journal
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
45 - 57
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History