Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods:
Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 115 - 144
Published: Jun 13, 2019
Abstract
Publication bias and questionable research practices in primary research can lead to badly overestimated effects in meta-analysis. Methodologists have proposed a variety of statistical approaches...
Paper Details
Title
Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods:
Published Date
Jun 13, 2019
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
115 - 144
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History