Review paper
Changing proxies for evaluating research performance: what matters to university programme heads?
Abstract
The tourism and hospitality research and publishing landscape have faced radical changes over the last decade. As a result, there have been calls for more holistic approaches for evaluating an academic’s research performance. Yet, updated research on the perceptions of what constitutes ‘good’ research performance remain under-studied. To address this gap, the objective of this study is to examine how current university programme heads in tourism...
Paper Details
Title
Changing proxies for evaluating research performance: what matters to university programme heads?
Published Date
Dec 20, 2017
Journal
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
346 - 355
Citation AnalysisPro
You’ll need to upgrade your plan to Pro
Looking to understand the true influence of a researcher’s work across journals & affiliations?
- Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
- Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.
Notes
History