Match!

Religious authority and the transmission of abstract god concepts

Published on May 19, 2018in Philosophical Psychology1.15
· DOI :10.1080/09515089.2017.1409888
Nathan Cofnas4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Balliol College)
Abstract
AbstractAccording to the Standard Model account of religion, religious concepts tend to conform to “minimally counterintuitive” schemas. Laypeople may, to varying degrees, verbally endorse the abstract doctrines taught by professional theologians. But, outside the Sunday school exam room, the implicit representations that tend to guide people’s everyday thinking, feeling, and behavior are about minimally counterintuitive entities. According to the Standard Model, these implicit representations are the essential thing to be explained by the cognitive science of religion (CSR). It is argued here that this theoretical orientation of mainstream CSR misses a whole dimension of religiosity—the acceptance of certain religious authorities, that is, the acceptance of other people’s superior expertise. Average believers (especially in doctrinal traditions) tend to accept the authority of religious experts who espouse highly counterintuitive ideas that they (the laypeople) understand in a distorted form, if at all. ...
  • References (36)
  • Citations (0)
References36
Newest
#1Aiyana K. Willard (University of Texas at Austin)H-Index: 8
#2Joseph Henrich (Harvard University)H-Index: 58
Last.Ara Norenzayan (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 39
view all 3 authors...
#1Benjamin Grant Purzycki (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 11
#2Aiyana K. Willard (UBC: University of British Columbia)H-Index: 8
#1Daniel Kahneman (Princeton University)H-Index: 111
View next paperReligious Orientation, Self-Esteem and Happiness among Undergraduate Students