Match!

An adaptive importance sampling method with a Kriging metamodel to calculate failure probability

Published on Dec 1, 2017in Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology1.22
· DOI :10.1007/s12206-017-1119-8
Seung-Gyu Lee2
Estimated H-index: 2
(KARI: Korea Aerospace Research Institute),
Jae-Hoon Kim12
Estimated H-index: 12
(CNU: Chungnam National University)
Abstract
A Markov chain simulation was performed to extract points in a failure region. A Kriging metamodel was constructed to approximate a limit state based on the points extracted by the Markov chain simulation. A kernel sampling density was constructed to approximate the optimal importance sampling density. The points extracted in the failure region by the Markov chain simulation were assumed as a mean of each kernel. An importance sampling method was applied to calculate the failure probability. In the importance sampling method, points are extracted from the kernel in the vicinity of a limit state. Considering the statistical distance as well as the learning function, additional experimental points were selected for the kriging metamodel. A stable numerical calculation method was applied to find the parameters of the kernel sampling density. The completeness of the Kriging metamodel was evaluated on the basis of possible changes in failure probability.
  • References (13)
  • Citations (2)
References13
Newest
#1Hailong Zhao (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)H-Index: 3
#2Zhufeng Yue (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)H-Index: 22
Last.Yishang Zhang (NPU: Northwestern Polytechnical University)H-Index: 6
view all 5 authors...
54 CitationsSource
#1Francesco Cadini (Polytechnic University of Milan)H-Index: 15
#2Francisco Santos (Polytechnic University of Milan)H-Index: 26
Last.Enrico Zio (Polytechnic University of Milan)H-Index: 53
view all 3 authors...
79 CitationsSource
#1V. Dubourg (International Facility Management Association)H-Index: 5
#2Bruno Sudret (ETH Zurich)H-Index: 28
Last.F. DeheegerH-Index: 3
view all 3 authors...
186 CitationsSource
#1B. Echard (Institut Français)H-Index: 4
#2Nicolas Gayton (Institut Français)H-Index: 12
Last.Maurice Lemaire (Institut Français)H-Index: 15
view all 3 authors...
342 CitationsSource
#1B. J. Bichon (Vandy: Vanderbilt University)H-Index: 1
#2Michael S. EldredH-Index: 25
Last.John McFarlandH-Index: 5
view all 5 authors...
306 CitationsSource
55 CitationsSource
2 CitationsSource
#1Marco Antonio Meggiolaro (PUC-Rio: Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro)H-Index: 16
#2J.T.P. Castro (PUC-Rio: Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro)H-Index: 4
137 CitationsSource
#1Jerome SacksH-Index: 26
#2William J. WelchH-Index: 26
Last.Henry P. WynnH-Index: 25
view all 4 authors...
4,432 Citations
#1Siu-Kui Au (California Institute of Technology)H-Index: 37
#2James L. Beck (California Institute of Technology)H-Index: 52
257 CitationsSource
Cited By2
Newest
#1Xiaosong Du (Iowa State University)H-Index: 3
#2Leifur Leifsson (Iowa State University)H-Index: 15
Last.Ronald A. Roberts (Iowa State University)H-Index: 10
view all 6 authors...
1 CitationsSource
#1Wei Dong Chen (HEU: Harbin Engineering University)H-Index: 1
#2Chunlong Xu (HEU: Harbin Engineering University)H-Index: 1
Last.Shengzhuo Lu (HEU: Harbin Engineering University)H-Index: 1
view all 5 authors...
Source