Match!

Using Computer Simulations for Promoting Model-based Reasoning

Published on Nov 1, 2017in Science Education2.897
· DOI :10.1007/s11191-017-9944-9
Maria Develaki4
Estimated H-index: 4
(NCSE: National Center for Science Education)
Sources
Abstract
Scientific reasoning is particularly pertinent to science education since it is closely related to the content and methodologies of science and contributes to scientific literacy. Much of the research in science education investigates the appropriate framework and teaching methods and tools needed to promote students’ ability to reason and evaluate in a scientific way. This paper aims (a) to contribute to an extended understanding of the nature and pedagogical importance of model-based reasoning and (b) to exemplify how using computer simulations can support students’ model-based reasoning. We provide first a background for both scientific reasoning and computer simulations, based on the relevant philosophical views and the related educational discussion. This background suggests that the model-based framework provides an epistemologically valid and pedagogically appropriate basis for teaching scientific reasoning and for helping students develop sounder reasoning and decision-taking abilities and explains how using computer simulations can foster these abilities. We then provide some examples illustrating the use of computer simulations to support model-based reasoning and evaluation activities in the classroom. The examples reflect the procedure and criteria for evaluating models in science and demonstrate the educational advantages of their application in classroom reasoning activities.
  • References (93)
  • Citations (4)
📖 Papers frequently viewed together
1 Citations
9 Citations
14 Citations
78% of Scinapse members use related papers. After signing in, all features are FREE.
References93
Newest
#1Per Morten Kind (Durham University)H-Index: 9
#2Jonathan Osborne (Stanford University)H-Index: 49
In this paper, we contend that what to teach about scientific reasoning has been bedeviled by a lack of clarity about the construct. Drawing on the insights emerging from a cognitive history of science, we argue for a conception of scientific reasoning based on six “styles of scientific reasoning.” Each “style” requires its own specific ontological and procedural entities, and invokes its own epistemic values and constructs. Consequently, learning science requires the development of not just con...
18 CitationsSource
#1Yefrin Ariza (UBA: University of Buenos Aires)H-Index: 2
#2Pablo Lorenzano (CONICET: National Scientific and Technical Research Council)H-Index: 6
Last. Agustín Adúriz-Bravo (UBA: University of Buenos Aires)H-Index: 11
view all 3 authors...
There is nowadays consensus in the community of didactics of science (i.e. science education understood as an academic discipline) regarding the need to include the philosophy of science in didactical research, science teacher education, curriculum design, and the practice of science education in all educational levels. Some authors have identified an ever-increasing use of the concept of ‘theoretical model’, stemming from the so-called semantic view of scientific theories. However, it can be re...
2 CitationsSource
Models and modeling are core elements of scientific methods and consequently also are of key importance for the conception and teaching of scientific methodology. The epistemology of models and its transfer and adaption to nature of science education are not, however, simple themes. We present some conceptual units in which school science models are used for exemplifying aspects and issues that we consider crucial for an understanding of models and modelling, such as: the perspectival and concep...
2 CitationsSource
#1John K. GilbertH-Index: 43
#2Rosária JustiH-Index: 20
37 CitationsSource
#1Laura Zangori (MU: University of Missouri)H-Index: 10
#2Cory T. Forbes (NU: University of Nebraska–Lincoln)H-Index: 14
Last. Christina V. Schwarz (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 12
view all 3 authors...
Opportunities to generate model-based explanations are crucial for elementary students, yet are rarely foregrounded in elementary science learning environments despite evidence that early learners can reason from models when provided with scaffolding. We used a quasi-experimental research design to investigate the comparative impact of a scaffold test condition consisting of embedded physical scaffolds within a curricular modeling task on third-grade (age 8–9) students’ formulation of model-base...
11 CitationsSource
#1Joseph Krajcik (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 67
#2Susan Codere (Michigan Department of Education)H-Index: 1
Last. Kongju Mun (MSU: Michigan State University)H-Index: 3
view all 5 authors...
The National Research Council’s Framework for K-12 Science Education and the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States in Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press, Washington, 2013) move teaching away from covering many isolated facts to a focus on a smaller number of disciplinary core ideas (DCIs) and crosscutting concepts that can be used to explain phenomena and solve problems by engaging in science and engineering practices. The NGSS pr...
67 CitationsSource
#1William F. McComas (UA: University of Arkansas)H-Index: 20
Benchmarks emerged after a three year research study sponsored by the AAAS called Project 2061. This name is inspired by Halley’s Comet which was last seen in 1985 when work began on the project. It relates to the scientific and technological changes children entering school in 1985 might expect to see before the comet returns in 2061.
300 CitationsSource
#1Agustín Adúriz-Bravo (UBA: University of Buenos Aires)H-Index: 11
In this paper I inspect a ‘semantic’ view of scientific models taken from contemporary philosophy of science—I draw upon the so-called ‘semanticist family’, which frontally challenges the received, syntactic conception of scientific theories. I argue that a semantic view may be of use both for science education in the classrooms of all educational levels, and for research and innovation within the discipline of didactics of science. I explore and characterise a model-based account of the nature ...
37 CitationsSource
#1Suvi Tala (UH: University of Helsinki)H-Index: 5
The content of the expertise which young natural scientists try to gain by doing science in research groups is a relatively little-explored subject. What makes learning in such settings challenging is that a central part of the expertise is tacit. This study employs empirical methods together with a contextualized approach and interdisciplinary cooperation in order to reveal practicing nanomodellers’ (N = 10) perspectives on their knowledge-building expertise, and on young scientists’ expertise ...
5 CitationsSource
#1Ton de Jong (UT: University of Twente)H-Index: 39
#2Marcia C. Linn (University of California, Berkeley)H-Index: 62
Last. Zacharias C. Zacharia (UCY: University of Cyprus)H-Index: 22
view all 3 authors...
The world needs young people who are skillful in and enthusiastic about science and who view science as their future career field. Ensuring that we will have such young people requires initiatives that engage students in interesting and motivating science experiences. Today, students can investigate scientific phenomena using the tools, data collection techniques, models, and theories of science in physical laboratories that support interactions with the material world or in virtual laboratories...
244 CitationsSource
Cited By4
Newest
#1Xinyu He (CCNU: Central China Normal University)
#2Yang Deng (CCNU: Central China Normal University)
Last. Houxiong Wang (CCNU: Central China Normal University)
view all 4 authors...
Scientific argumentation is a key practice in the construction, confirmation, and legalization of scientific knowledge. Although studies on scientific argumentation have been relatively plentiful, there are few quantitative studies on how students mentally perceive scientific argumentation, given that traditional quantitative tools such as Likert scales are usually decontextualized or applied in unrealistic situations. In light of this limitation in educational research, the following research q...
Source
#1Gretchen P. King (NU: University of Nebraska–Lincoln)
#2Heather E. Bergan-Roller (NIU: Northern Illinois University)H-Index: 2
Last. Joseph T. Dauer (NU: University of Nebraska–Lincoln)H-Index: 12
view all 5 authors...
ABSTRACTModel-based instruction offers numerous benefits to students, including increased content knowledge and critical thinking. This study explored the differences in the knowledge outcomes and ...
Source
#1Yuan Guo (Jiangsu University)
#2Wei Chen (Jiangsu University)
Last. Yu-Qin Guo (Jiangsu University)
view all 4 authors...
Abstract With the arrival of big data era, the integration of Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) and Bayesian Network (BN) has become increasingly a promising technology in implementing the intelligence of engineering application. To further improve the efficiency of the integrated system and make it adapt to the large number of parameter under big data, Within-Cross (WC) algorithm is proposed in this paper to assigned big data to each slave node of Hadoop platform for parallel data processing. The WC a...
Source
#1Maria Develaki (NCSE: National Center for Science Education)H-Index: 4
While computer simulations are a key element in understanding and doing science today, their nature and implications for science education have not been adequately explored in the relevant literature. In this article, (1) we provide an analysis of the methodology and epistemology of computer simulations, aiming to contribute to a sound and comprehensive account of the nature of computer simulations in science education, and (2) examine certain implications for science education, particularly in ...
Source
#1Sonu JoseH-Index: 1
#2Siming LiuH-Index: 4
Last. Sergiu M. DascaluH-Index: 13
view all 4 authors...
Source