Investigating the effects of peer to peer prompts on collaborative argumentation, consensus and perceived efficacy in collaborative learning

Volume: 12, Issue: 3, Pages: 307 - 336
Published: Sep 1, 2017
Abstract
In a society which is calling for more productive modes of collaboration to address increasingly complex scientific and social issues, greater involvement of students in dialogue, and increased emphasis on collaborative discourse and argumentation, become essential modes of engagement and learning. This paper investigates the effects of facilitator-driven versus peer-driven prompts on perceived and objective consensus, perceived efficacy, team...
Paper Details
Title
Investigating the effects of peer to peer prompts on collaborative argumentation, consensus and perceived efficacy in collaborative learning
Published Date
Sep 1, 2017
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
307 - 336
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.