Do younger Sleeping Beauties prefer a technological prince

Published on Feb 1, 2018in Scientometrics2.77
· DOI :10.1007/s11192-017-2603-8
Anthony F. J. van Raan32
Estimated H-index: 32
(LEI: Leiden University),
Jos J. Winnink5
Estimated H-index: 5
(LEI: Leiden University)
In this paper we investigate recent Sleeping Beauties cited in patents (SB-SNPRs). We find that the increasing trend of the relative number of SBs stopped around 1998. Moreover, we find that the time lag between the publication year of the SB-SNPRs and their first citation in a patent is becoming shorter in recent years. Our observations also suggest that, on average, in the more recent years SBs are awakened increasingly earlier by a ‘technological prince’ rather than by a ‘scientific prince’. These observations suggest that SBs with technological importance are ‘discovered’ earlier in an application-oriented context. Then, because of this earlier recognized technological relevance, papers may be cited also earlier in a scientific context. Thus early recognized technological relevance may ‘prevent’ papers to become an SB. The scientific impact of Sleeping Beauties is generally not necessarily related to the technological importance of the SBs, as far as measured with number and impact of the citing patents. The analysis of the occurrence of inventor-author relations as well as the citation years of inventor-author patents suggest that the scientific awakening of Sleeping Beauties only rarely occurs by inventor-author self-citation.
  • References (13)
  • Citations (4)
#1Anthony F. J. van Raan (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 32
16 CitationsSource
16 CitationsSource
#1Anthony F. J. van Raan (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 32
37 CitationsSource
#1Jos J. Winnink (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 5
#2Robert J.W. Tijssen (Stellenbosch University)H-Index: 6
16 CitationsSource
#1Julie Callaert (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 11
#2Maikel Pellens (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 4
Last.Bart Van Looy (UT: University of Twente)H-Index: 28
view all 3 authors...
24 CitationsSource
May 7, 2006 in ECCV (European Conference on Computer Vision)
#1Jiangjian Xiao (Sarnoff Corporation)H-Index: 15
#2Hui Cheng (Sarnoff Corporation)H-Index: 17
Last.Michael Anthony Isnardi (Sarnoff Corporation)H-Index: 7
view all 5 authors...
185 CitationsSource
#1Zhonghua LuH-Index: 1
#2Jeff Dahn (Dal: Dalhousie University)H-Index: 99
273 CitationsSource
991 CitationsSource
#1K. Haraguchi (Hitachi)H-Index: 10
#2Toshio Katsuyama (Hitachi)H-Index: 19
Last.Kensuke Ogawa (Hitachi)H-Index: 9
view all 4 authors...
168 CitationsSource
476 CitationsSource
Cited By4
#1Guoliang Lyu (ZSTU: Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)
#2Ganwei Shi (ZSTU: Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)
#1Reinhilde Veugelers (Bruegel)H-Index: 5
#2Jian Wang (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)H-Index: 13
1 CitationsSource
#1Jianhua Hou (SYSU: Sun Yat-sen University)
#2Xiucai Yang (DUT: Dalian University of Technology)H-Index: 1
View next paperDelayed Recognition in Science: Different Causes of Sleeping and Awakening of Discoveries