Revealed and Stated Preferences of Decision Makers for Priority Setting in Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review

Volume: 36, Issue: 3, Pages: 323 - 340
Published: Nov 9, 2017
Abstract
There is much interest from stakeholders in understanding how health technology assessment (HTA) committees make national funding decisions for health technologies. A growing literature has analysed past decisions by committees (revealed preference, RP studies) and hypothetical decisions by committee members (stated preference, SP studies) to identify factors influencing decisions and assess their importance. A systematic review of the...
Paper Details
Title
Revealed and Stated Preferences of Decision Makers for Priority Setting in Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review
Published Date
Nov 9, 2017
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
323 - 340
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.