Match!

Organizationally Intractable Decision Problems and the Intellectual Virtues of Heuristics

Published on Nov 1, 2017in Journal of Management9.06
· DOI :10.1177/0149206316679253
Richard A. Bettis29
Estimated H-index: 29
(UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Abstract
There is no theory in strategic management and other related fields for identifying decision problems that cannot be solved by organizations using rational analytical technologies of the type typically taught in MBA programs. Furthermore, some and perhaps many scholars in strategic management believe that the alternative of heuristics or “rules of thumb” is little more than crude guesses for decision making when compared to rational analytical technologies. This is reflected in a paucity of research in strategic management on heuristics. I propose a theory of “organizational intractability” based roughly on the metaphor provided by “computational intractability” in computer science. I demonstrate organizational intractability for a common model of the joint strategic planning and resource allocation decision problem. This raises the possibility that heuristics are necessary for deciding many important decisions that are intractable for organizations. This possibility parallels the extensive use of heurist...
  • References (46)
  • Citations (7)
References46
Newest
#1Massimo Garbuio (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 7
#2Dan Lovallo (USYD: University of Sydney)H-Index: 17
Last.Olivier Sibony (McKinsey & Company)H-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
9 CitationsSource
#1Moritz Loock (HSG: University of St. Gallen)H-Index: 10
#2Gieri Hinnen (HSG: University of St. Gallen)H-Index: 2
27 CitationsSource
#1Paula Jarzabkowski (City University London)H-Index: 36
#2Sarah Kaplan (U of T: University of Toronto)H-Index: 18
135 CitationsSource
#1John R. Graham (Duke University)H-Index: 49
#2R HarveyCampbell (Duke University)H-Index: 71
Last.Manju Puri (Duke University)H-Index: 27
view all 3 authors...
101 CitationsSource
#1Philip Bromiley (UCI: University of California, Irvine)H-Index: 32
#2Devaki Rau (NIU: Northern Illinois University)H-Index: 13
52 CitationsSource
#1Shabnam Mousavi (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 6
#2Gerd Gigerenzer (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 81
70 CitationsSource
#1Noson S. YanofskyH-Index: 7
15 Citations
#1Leslie ValiantH-Index: 1
85 Citations
#1Robert UntiedtH-Index: 3
#2Michael NippaH-Index: 12
Last.Ulrich Pidun (Boston Consulting Group)H-Index: 13
view all 3 authors...
8 CitationsSource
#1Christopher B. Bingham (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 15
#2Jerayr Haleblian (UGA: University of Georgia)H-Index: 17
35 CitationsSource
Cited By7
Newest
#1Timo Ralf Ehrig (MPG: Max Planck Society)H-Index: 2
#2Jens Schmidt (Aalto University)H-Index: 3
Source
#1Marc H. Anderson (Iowa State University)H-Index: 15
#2Russell K. Lemken (ECU: East Carolina University)
Source
#1Victor Zitian Chen (UNCC: University of North Carolina at Charlotte)H-Index: 9
#2Michael A. Hitt (A&M: Texas A&M University)H-Index: 98
Source
#1Christopher B. Bingham (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 15
#2Travis Howell (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 1
Last.Timothy E. Ott (UNC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
2 CitationsSource
#1Yury V. Kirillov (NSTU: Novosibirsk State Technical University)
#2Evgeniya V. Dragunova (NSTU: Novosibirsk State Technical University)
Last.Anatoly V. Kravchenko (NSTU: Novosibirsk State Technical University)
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Richard A. BettisH-Index: 29
#2Songcui HuH-Index: 4
Source
#1Catherine A. Maritan (SU: Syracuse University)H-Index: 8
#2Gwendolyn K. Lee (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 9
3 CitationsSource